Skip to main content

Understanding US PMI as a Leading Indicator: Correlation Analysis GDP

How well do quarterly changes in PMI predict economic growth? An analysis of 10+ years of data (Q1 2015 - Q3 2025)

When it comes to tracking economic momentum, quarterly changes in Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) data provide valuable signals about GDP growth. My analysis of over 10 years of data reveals which PMI indicators are the most reliable for economic forecasting.

Manufacturing PMI: Moderate but Significant

Both ISM and S&P Global manufacturing PMI show statistically significant correlations with manufacturing GDP growth, with S&P Global slightly outperforming.

Manufacturing PMI Growth Correlations

ISM Manufacturing PMI: r = 0.451 (p = 0.0027)
S&P Global Manufacturing PMI: r = 0.520 (p = 0.0004)
Figure 1: Manufacturing PMI Growth Correlations. Scatter plots show moderate positive relationships between quarterly PMI changes and manufacturing GDP growth.

Services PMI: The Superior Indicator

The services sector analysis reveals much stronger correlations. Given that services represent approximately 70% of US GDP, these findings have significant implications for economic forecasting.

Services PMI Growth Correlations

ISM Services PMI: r = 0.693 (p < 0.0001)
S&P Global Services PMI: r = 0.770 (p < 0.0001)
Figure 2: Services PMI Growth Correlations. The S&P Global Services PMI achieves a strong correlation of 0.770, explaining approximately 59% of quarterly GDP growth variance.

Key Takeaway

S&P Global Services PMI stands out as the strongest predictor, achieving what statisticians classify as a strong correlation (r > 0.7). Changes in this indicator can explain approximately 59% of the variance in quarterly services GDP growth.

Practical Implications

These findings suggest three practical strategies for economic analysis:

  • Prioritize services PMI: The strong correlation between services PMI changes and GDP growth makes this a primary indicator for tracking real-time economic conditions. Focus especially on S&P Global Services PMI.
  • Track quarter-over-quarter changes: A move from PMI 51 to 52 signals strengthening momentum more meaningfully than the absolute level. Focus on the direction and magnitude of change.
  • Watch for divergences: When manufacturing and services PMI trends diverge significantly, it often signals sectoral shifts that may not be immediately apparent in aggregate data.

Bottom Line

Quarterly changes in PMI data provide statistically significant information about economic growth, with services sector indicators substantially outperforming manufacturing. The S&P Global Services PMI, with its 0.770 correlation, should be a cornerstone of any real-time economic monitoring toolkit.

Methodology

Data: Manufacturing GDP (FRED: VAPGDPMFG), Services GDP (FRED: SRVPRD), ISM and S&P Global PMI series

Approach: Monthly PMI converted to quarterly averages; Pearson correlations calculated between PMI changes and GDP growth rates (Q1 2015 - Q3 2025)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mapping the Blast Radius: What Happens When the "World's Factory" Stops?

In global trade, "efficiency" often masks "fragility." We know that China is central to the global electronics supply chain, but how central? And if that node were to go dark, who would feel the shockwaves first? To answer this, I moved beyond standard trade statistics and built a network simulation using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) Tables (2023 Edition) . This dataset maps the DNA of the global economy, tracking every dollar of input across 66 countries and 45 industries. 1. The Blast Radius: Tracing the Contagion I treated the global economy as a directed graph and simulated a total supply shock to Chinese Electronics (CHN_C26) . By tracing the flow of inputs across three tiers of buyers, I visualized the "Blast Radius" of this disruption. Fig 1: The Supply Chain Cascade. The shock originates in China (Red) and immediately hits "Tier 1" assembly hubs (Dark Blue) before cascading to global consumers...

Turkey's Informality Tax

A general-equilibrium model of Turkey's dual labour market says the cost of taxing formal work doesn't show up where we usually look for it. The bottomline: Making Turkey's transfer to the unemployed a third more generous raises unemployment from 8.6% to 9.2% . That is the honest cost, and it is not large. How you pay for it matters more than whether you pay for it. Funded by payroll taxes, the poor end up 0.6% worse off than before the transfer was raised — the policy defeats itself. Funded by VAT, they are 0.5% better off . The reason is not unemployment, which is nearly identical under both. It is informality . A higher payroll tax pushes formal jobs into the unregistered sector, where the wage is 43% lower and nothing is taxed. Turkey is not on the wrong side of the payroll-tax Laffer curve — revenue peaks around 53%, well above today's ~37.5% wedge. But the marginal cost...

The Labor Market Impacts of AI in Türkiye: Beyond Occupational Exposure Analysis

Beyond Exposure AI and Labor Markets · Türkiye Occupational exposure to AI identifies where technology may affect work, but not whether employment will contract, reorganize, or expand. Applying the Richmond (2026) AI Jobs Transition Framework to Türkiye's 2024 Household Labour Force Survey, the dominant high-exposure archetype is not automation. It is reorganization. Mpumelelo Nxumalo and Dhushyanth Raju · Summary of the working paper Beyond Exposure: AI and Labor Market Reorganization in Türkiye Most discussion of AI and jobs runs on a single number: how much of an occupation's task content a model can perform. That number identifies where technology reaches. It does not say what happens next. An exposed occupation may shed workers, or it may keep them while the work itself is rebuilt around the technology. Those are different outcomes, they call for different policy, and exposure alone cannot tell them apart. Applying the Richmond (202...