Skip to main content

Mapping the Blast Radius: What Happens When the "World's Factory" Stops?

In global trade, "efficiency" often masks "fragility." We know that China is central to the global electronics supply chain, but how central? And if that node were to go dark, who would feel the shockwaves first?

To answer this, I moved beyond standard trade statistics and built a network simulation using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) Tables (2023 Edition). This dataset maps the DNA of the global economy, tracking every dollar of input across 66 countries and 45 industries.

1. The Blast Radius: Tracing the Contagion

I treated the global economy as a directed graph and simulated a total supply shock to Chinese Electronics (CHN_C26). By tracing the flow of inputs across three tiers of buyers, I visualized the "Blast Radius" of this disruption.

Fig 1: The Supply Chain Cascade. The shock originates in China (Red) and immediately hits "Tier 1" assembly hubs (Dark Blue) before cascading to global consumers.

The network map reveals a distinct "Hub and Spoke" architecture. The shock doesn't hit everyone equally. It first devastates domestic Chinese sectors (Red nodes) and key international processing hubs like Vietnam and Mexico (Dark Blue nodes). These countries act as "transmission gears," passing the shock downstream to the final consumers in the US and Europe (Light Blue nodes on the far right).

2. The Risk Matrix: Vulnerability vs. Scale

Not all dependencies are created equal. Some industries buy a lot from China but have diversified suppliers. Others are smaller but entirely dependent. I plotted every global industry on a Risk Matrix to identify the critical vulnerabilities.

Fig 2: The Risk Matrix. Industries in the top-right corner (High Value + High Dependence) are "Too Big to Fail."
Key Finding: The data exposes a "Critical Quadrant" of risk. Vietnam Electronics and Mexico Electronics appear in the extreme top-right. They rely on Chinese inputs for >6% of their total production value, making them single points of failure in the global chain.

Conclusion

This analysis confirms that "de-coupling" is mathematically difficult. The network structure shows that even countries appearing "independent" are often just one node removed from the center. The blast radius of a single node is global, instantaneous, and unavoidable.

Comments

Post a Comment

Constructive feedback is always welcome. Thank you

Popular posts from this blog

Turkey's Informality Tax

A general-equilibrium model of Turkey's dual labour market says the cost of taxing formal work doesn't show up where we usually look for it. The bottomline: Making Turkey's transfer to the unemployed a third more generous raises unemployment from 8.6% to 9.2% . That is the honest cost, and it is not large. How you pay for it matters more than whether you pay for it. Funded by payroll taxes, the poor end up 0.6% worse off than before the transfer was raised — the policy defeats itself. Funded by VAT, they are 0.5% better off . The reason is not unemployment, which is nearly identical under both. It is informality . A higher payroll tax pushes formal jobs into the unregistered sector, where the wage is 43% lower and nothing is taxed. Turkey is not on the wrong side of the payroll-tax Laffer curve — revenue peaks around 53%, well above today's ~37.5% wedge. But the marginal cost...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Labor Market Impacts of AI in Türkiye: Beyond Occupational Exposure Analysis

Beyond Exposure AI and Labor Markets · Türkiye Occupational exposure to AI identifies where technology may affect work, but not whether employment will contract, reorganize, or expand. Applying the Richmond (2026) AI Jobs Transition Framework to Türkiye's 2024 Household Labour Force Survey, the dominant high-exposure archetype is not automation. It is reorganization. Mpumelelo Nxumalo and Dhushyanth Raju · Summary of the working paper Beyond Exposure: AI and Labor Market Reorganization in Türkiye Most discussion of AI and jobs runs on a single number: how much of an occupation's task content a model can perform. That number identifies where technology reaches. It does not say what happens next. An exposed occupation may shed workers, or it may keep them while the work itself is rebuilt around the technology. Those are different outcomes, they call for different policy, and exposure alone cannot tell them apart. Applying the Richmond (202...
Post a Comment
Read more