Skip to main content

Reflections on U.S. Manufacturing PMI: A Two-Year and Decade-Long Perspective

The Institute for Supply Management's (ISM) Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index remains one of the most closely watched economic indicators in the United States. As we reflect on recent trends spanning both the past two years and the broader decade-long trajectory, a nuanced picture of American manufacturing emerges—one marked by resilience, structural challenges, and the enduring impact of global disruptions.

The Recent Struggle: Two Years of Persistent Contraction

The past two years have been particularly challenging for U.S. manufacturing. From November 2023 through October 2025, the PMI has remained in contraction territory for an overwhelming majority of the period—hovering around an average of 48.4, well below the critical threshold of 50 that separates expansion from contraction.

Figure 1: Two-year comparison of ISM Manufacturing PMI and Production Index (November 2023 - October 2025)

What's particularly striking about this period is the persistence of the weakness. Unlike brief contractionary episodes that might reflect temporary supply chain disruptions or seasonal factors, this extended period below 50 suggests deeper structural headwinds. The manufacturing sector has expanded in only 12.5% of the months during this two-year window—a stark indicator of sustained pressure on the sector.

Current PMI (Oct 2025)
48.7
24-Month Average
48.4
% Time in Expansion
12.5%
Production Index (Oct 2025)
48.2

Key Observations from the Recent Period

  • Interest Rate Impact: The Federal Reserve's aggressive rate hikes to combat inflation have dampened demand for durable goods, directly impacting manufacturing orders.
  • Inventory Adjustments: After the pandemic-era inventory buildup, manufacturers have been working through excess stock, leading to reduced production needs.
  • Global Uncertainty: Geopolitical tensions and shifting trade patterns have created hesitancy in capital investment and long-term manufacturing commitments.
  • Production Volatility: The Production Index has shown significantly higher volatility (standard deviation of 2.27) compared to the overall PMI, indicating operational instability.

The Decade in Perspective: From Boom to Bust and Back

Zooming out to examine the full decade from 2015 to 2025 provides essential context for understanding current conditions. This ten-year journey encompasses periods of robust expansion, a historic pandemic-induced collapse, an extraordinary recovery, and now, a period of recalibration.

Figure 2: Ten-year trend analysis of ISM Manufacturing PMI (2015-2025) showing major economic cycles

The Pre-Pandemic Era (2015-2019): The mid-to-late 2010s represented a period of steady, if unspectacular, manufacturing growth. PMI readings consistently hovered in the low-to-mid 50s, reflecting moderate expansion supported by stable global trade, low interest rates, and steady consumer demand. The 2017-2018 period was particularly strong, with readings frequently in the upper 50s, buoyed by corporate tax cuts and business optimism.

The COVID Shock (2020): April 2020 marked the steepest decline in manufacturing activity in modern history, with the PMI plummeting to 41.5. This wasn't merely a contraction—it was a near-complete halt of manufacturing operations as lockdowns shut down factories and severed supply chains. The recovery that followed was swift but bumpy, characterized by unprecedented supply-demand mismatches.

The Post-COVID Boom (2021): The manufacturing sector experienced its most robust expansion in decades during 2021, with PMI readings soaring above 60 for extended periods—peaking around 64.7 in March. This remarkable surge was driven by pent-up demand, government stimulus, and aggressive restocking. However, this proved to be unsustainable, as supply chains remained constrained and labor shortages intensified.

The Current Adjustment Phase (2022-2025): Since the 2021 peak, manufacturing has been in a protracted adjustment phase. The rapid ascent gave way to a gradual but persistent decline. By 2023, the index had returned to contraction territory and has largely remained there through 2025. This reflects not just cyclical weakness but potentially structural shifts in how and where goods are manufactured.

Decade-Long Trends: What the Data Reveals

  • Volatility Increased: Manufacturing activity has become significantly more volatile compared to the pre-pandemic era, reflecting greater economic uncertainty.
  • Shorter Cycles: The boom-bust cycles have compressed—from pandemic collapse to record expansion to persistent contraction in just five years.
  • Structural Shifts: The decade has seen manufacturing increasingly sensitive to interest rates, highlighting the sector's growing capital intensity.
  • Resilience Despite Challenges: Even during periods of contraction, the PMI has remained above the 42.3 level that historically signals recession, suggesting manufacturing weakness alone hasn't dragged down the broader economy.

What This Means for the Future

The ISM Manufacturing PMI tells a story of a sector in transition. The persistent weakness over the past two years doesn't necessarily portend economic disaster—the broader economy has remained relatively resilient, supported by strong services sector performance and robust consumer spending. However, the manufacturing data does signal important shifts:

First, the days of easy manufacturing growth may be behind us. The combination of higher interest rates, increased automation, shifting global supply chains, and deglobalization pressures creates a more challenging environment for traditional manufacturing expansion.

Second, the volatility of the past decade suggests that manufacturing will remain highly sensitive to external shocks—whether pandemic-related, geopolitical, or monetary policy-driven. Businesses and policymakers must build greater resilience into manufacturing operations and supply chains.

Third, the disconnect between overall PMI and production volatility hints at operational challenges beyond simple demand fluctuations. Companies are grappling with workforce issues, technological transitions, and fundamental questions about optimal production locations.

Conclusion

As we look at the ISM Manufacturing PMI data spanning the last two years and the broader decade, we see a sector that has weathered extraordinary challenges—from a global pandemic to radical shifts in monetary policy to evolving trade dynamics. The current period of contraction, while concerning, must be viewed within this broader context. Manufacturing is not collapsing but adapting, seeking a new equilibrium in a fundamentally changed economic landscape.

For investors, business leaders, and policymakers, the key insight is this: manufacturing's path forward will be neither a return to the steady expansion of the 2010s nor a repeat of the pandemic-era volatility. Instead, we're likely entering a period of moderated growth characterized by greater efficiency, increased automation, and a more nuanced relationship with global supply chains. Understanding these trends through the lens of PMI data remains essential for navigating the economic terrain ahead.

Data Source: Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing Reports

Analysis Period: November 2023 - October 2025 (recent trends), 2015-2025 (decade-long perspective)

Generated: November 2025

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mapping the Blast Radius: What Happens When the "World's Factory" Stops?

In global trade, "efficiency" often masks "fragility." We know that China is central to the global electronics supply chain, but how central? And if that node were to go dark, who would feel the shockwaves first? To answer this, I moved beyond standard trade statistics and built a network simulation using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) Tables (2023 Edition) . This dataset maps the DNA of the global economy, tracking every dollar of input across 66 countries and 45 industries. 1. The Blast Radius: Tracing the Contagion I treated the global economy as a directed graph and simulated a total supply shock to Chinese Electronics (CHN_C26) . By tracing the flow of inputs across three tiers of buyers, I visualized the "Blast Radius" of this disruption. Fig 1: The Supply Chain Cascade. The shock originates in China (Red) and immediately hits "Tier 1" assembly hubs (Dark Blue) before cascading to global consumers...

The Labor Market Impacts of AI in Türkiye: Beyond Occupational Exposure Analysis

Beyond Exposure AI and Labor Markets · Türkiye Occupational exposure to AI identifies where technology may affect work, but not whether employment will contract, reorganize, or expand. Applying the Richmond (2026) AI Jobs Transition Framework to Türkiye's 2024 Household Labour Force Survey, the dominant high-exposure archetype is not automation. It is reorganization. Mpumelelo Nxumalo and Dhushyanth Raju · Summary of the working paper Beyond Exposure: AI and Labor Market Reorganization in Türkiye Most discussion of AI and jobs runs on a single number: how much of an occupation's task content a model can perform. That number identifies where technology reaches. It does not say what happens next. An exposed occupation may shed workers, or it may keep them while the work itself is rebuilt around the technology. Those are different outcomes, they call for different policy, and exposure alone cannot tell them apart. Applying the Richmond (202...

Turkey's Informality Tax

A general-equilibrium model of Turkey's dual labour market says the cost of taxing formal work doesn't show up where we usually look for it. The bottomline: Making Turkey's transfer to the unemployed a third more generous raises unemployment from 8.6% to 9.2% . That is the honest cost, and it is not large. How you pay for it matters more than whether you pay for it. Funded by payroll taxes, the poor end up 0.6% worse off than before the transfer was raised — the policy defeats itself. Funded by VAT, they are 0.5% better off . The reason is not unemployment, which is nearly identical under both. It is informality . A higher payroll tax pushes formal jobs into the unregistered sector, where the wage is 43% lower and nothing is taxed. Turkey is not on the wrong side of the payroll-tax Laffer curve — revenue peaks around 53%, well above today's ~37.5% wedge. But the marginal cost...