Skip to main content

Assessing labor market transitions in Ghana using panel data

Understanding labor market transitions is important for policymakers and researchers in developing countries. Changes in economic activity status (employed, unemployed, out of labor force) vary significantly from one country to another and also within countries from one socio-economic group to another. Below I summarize analysis from the latest Ghana Annual Household Income and Expenditure Survey (AHIES) published by the Ghana Statistical Service. The AHIES is a panel survey that has followed over 10,000 individuals since 2022Q1 to assess changes in their livelihoods. I am currently analyzing trends and show here what has happened to economic activity between Q2 and Q3. 

Transitions in Ghana labor force status, 2022Q2 - 2022Q3
Source: Own analysis using AHIES from Ghana Statistical Service.
Note: Left hand side is 2022Q2 and right side is 2022Q3

  • 81 percent of working age individuals (15-64-years) who were employed in 2022Q2 were still employed in 2022Q3; 7 percent went into unemployment, and 13 percent dropped out of the labor force. Among youth (15-35-years), 72 percent who were employed in 2022Q2 were still employed in 2022Q3, while 9 percent fell into unemployment, and a further 19 percent dropped out of the labor force. The corresponding values for non-youth were 83 percent, 5 percent, and 12 percent.
  • 39 percent of working age individuals who were unemployed in 2022Q2 were employed in 2022Q3; 23 percent were still unemployed and 37 percent dropped out of the labor force. Among youth, 27 percent of those who were unemployed in 2022Q2 were still unemployed in 2022Q3, while 34 percent got employment, and a further 40 percent fell out of the labor force. 
  • 22 percent of those who were outside the labor force are now employed; 10 percent are unemployed; and 68 percent are still out of the labor force.
One salient observation for a country looking to create jobs for youth is that, compared to non-youth (35 years and older), youth (15-35) are close to 20ppts less likely to transition from unemployment to employment; 10ppts more likely to stay in unemployment, and 5 ppts more likely to transition from unemployment to out-of-labor force. 

Similarly, we can visualize transitions across statuses in employment.
Source: Own analysis using AHIES from Ghana Statistical Service.
Note: Left hand side is 2022Q2 and right side is 2022Q3.

Several factors affect labor market transitions in developing countries. It would be interesting to assess the role of the following: (i) economic cycles; (ii) labor market efficiency; (iii) barriers to returning to work; (iv) sectoral and occupational job mismatches; and, in the longer run, (v) structural transformation. Policymakers and researchers need to understand these factors to design effective labor market policies and services that can help individuals navigate these transitions.

Comments

Post a Comment

Constructive feedback is always welcome. Thank you

Popular posts from this blog

Mapping the Blast Radius: What Happens When the "World's Factory" Stops?

In global trade, "efficiency" often masks "fragility." We know that China is central to the global electronics supply chain, but how central? And if that node were to go dark, who would feel the shockwaves first? To answer this, I moved beyond standard trade statistics and built a network simulation using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) Tables (2023 Edition) . This dataset maps the DNA of the global economy, tracking every dollar of input across 66 countries and 45 industries. 1. The Blast Radius: Tracing the Contagion I treated the global economy as a directed graph and simulated a total supply shock to Chinese Electronics (CHN_C26) . By tracing the flow of inputs across three tiers of buyers, I visualized the "Blast Radius" of this disruption. Fig 1: The Supply Chain Cascade. The shock originates in China (Red) and immediately hits "Tier 1" assembly hubs (Dark Blue) before cascading to global consumers...
Post a Comment
Read more

Turkey's Informality Tax

A general-equilibrium model of Turkey's dual labour market says the cost of taxing formal work doesn't show up where we usually look for it. The bottomline: Making Turkey's transfer to the unemployed a third more generous raises unemployment from 8.6% to 9.2% . That is the honest cost, and it is not large. How you pay for it matters more than whether you pay for it. Funded by payroll taxes, the poor end up 0.6% worse off than before the transfer was raised — the policy defeats itself. Funded by VAT, they are 0.5% better off . The reason is not unemployment, which is nearly identical under both. It is informality . A higher payroll tax pushes formal jobs into the unregistered sector, where the wage is 43% lower and nothing is taxed. Turkey is not on the wrong side of the payroll-tax Laffer curve — revenue peaks around 53%, well above today's ~37.5% wedge. But the marginal cost...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Labor Market Impacts of AI in Türkiye: Beyond Occupational Exposure Analysis

Beyond Exposure AI and Labor Markets · Türkiye Occupational exposure to AI identifies where technology may affect work, but not whether employment will contract, reorganize, or expand. Applying the Richmond (2026) AI Jobs Transition Framework to Türkiye's 2024 Household Labour Force Survey, the dominant high-exposure archetype is not automation. It is reorganization. Mpumelelo Nxumalo and Dhushyanth Raju · Summary of the working paper Beyond Exposure: AI and Labor Market Reorganization in Türkiye Most discussion of AI and jobs runs on a single number: how much of an occupation's task content a model can perform. That number identifies where technology reaches. It does not say what happens next. An exposed occupation may shed workers, or it may keep them while the work itself is rebuilt around the technology. Those are different outcomes, they call for different policy, and exposure alone cannot tell them apart. Applying the Richmond (202...
Post a Comment
Read more