Skip to main content

Mapping the Matrix: Malaysia's Corporate Network

The complex interconnections that define modern society are readily visible in our Facebook or LinkedIn networks. But what about the corporate world?

I recently began mapping the web of cross-shareholding among Malaysia's listed corporations. Using Social Network Analysis (SNA), I visualized the ecosystem to identify key "communities" and power brokers. The goal? To see if a company's position in this web predicts its financial destiny.

The State of Play (2015)

Figure 1: Malaysia's Corporate Network in 2015 (Created via Gephi)
The map above visualizes the network as of 2015. While I have excluded specific company names, the "super-nodes" (the largest circles) represent the most connected shareholders in the economy—primarily government-linked investment companies (GLICs), fund managers, and international asset managers.

A Decade of Growing Complexity

As the Malaysian economy has grown, so has the complexity of its corporate ecosystem. Compare the dense web of 2015 (above) with the visualization below, based on data from 2005.
Figure 2: The sparsely connected network of 2005

Resilience vs. Returns

The evolution from "islands" of ownership to a massive "continent" of connectivity raises two critical questions:
  1. Contagion Risk: Does this hyper-connectivity make Corporate Malaysia more vulnerable to shocks? If one central node fails, does the whole network shake?
  2. Performance: Does location matter? My preliminary analysis suggests that densely connected firms tend to have superior financial performance (higher profitability and ROE) compared to those on the periphery.
This suggests a trade-off: connectedness may boost profits during good times, but it could amplify risks during a crisis.

Comments

  1. So much has changed in a decade. Good or bad?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is the purpose of the study. Its too early to say but the working hypothesis is that it depends. If greater connectedness has increased the risk of crisis contagion, then a dense network might not be ideal. If, however, it's led to more profitable and well-resourced companies, then it might be a good strategy for funds and other investors to allocate resources towards the most connected firms.
      I will be posting follow-up material as the analysis progresses.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Constructive feedback is always welcome. Thank you

Popular posts from this blog

Mapping the Blast Radius: What Happens When the "World's Factory" Stops?

In global trade, "efficiency" often masks "fragility." We know that China is central to the global electronics supply chain, but how central? And if that node were to go dark, who would feel the shockwaves first? To answer this, I moved beyond standard trade statistics and built a network simulation using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) Tables (2023 Edition) . This dataset maps the DNA of the global economy, tracking every dollar of input across 66 countries and 45 industries. 1. The Blast Radius: Tracing the Contagion I treated the global economy as a directed graph and simulated a total supply shock to Chinese Electronics (CHN_C26) . By tracing the flow of inputs across three tiers of buyers, I visualized the "Blast Radius" of this disruption. Fig 1: The Supply Chain Cascade. The shock originates in China (Red) and immediately hits "Tier 1" assembly hubs (Dark Blue) before cascading to global consumers...

Turkey's Informality Tax

A general-equilibrium model of Turkey's dual labour market says the cost of taxing formal work doesn't show up where we usually look for it. The bottomline: Making Turkey's transfer to the unemployed a third more generous raises unemployment from 8.6% to 9.2% . That is the honest cost, and it is not large. How you pay for it matters more than whether you pay for it. Funded by payroll taxes, the poor end up 0.6% worse off than before the transfer was raised — the policy defeats itself. Funded by VAT, they are 0.5% better off . The reason is not unemployment, which is nearly identical under both. It is informality . A higher payroll tax pushes formal jobs into the unregistered sector, where the wage is 43% lower and nothing is taxed. Turkey is not on the wrong side of the payroll-tax Laffer curve — revenue peaks around 53%, well above today's ~37.5% wedge. But the marginal cost...

The Labor Market Impacts of AI in Türkiye: Beyond Occupational Exposure Analysis

Beyond Exposure AI and Labor Markets · Türkiye Occupational exposure to AI identifies where technology may affect work, but not whether employment will contract, reorganize, or expand. Applying the Richmond (2026) AI Jobs Transition Framework to Türkiye's 2024 Household Labour Force Survey, the dominant high-exposure archetype is not automation. It is reorganization. Mpumelelo Nxumalo and Dhushyanth Raju · Summary of the working paper Beyond Exposure: AI and Labor Market Reorganization in Türkiye Most discussion of AI and jobs runs on a single number: how much of an occupation's task content a model can perform. That number identifies where technology reaches. It does not say what happens next. An exposed occupation may shed workers, or it may keep them while the work itself is rebuilt around the technology. Those are different outcomes, they call for different policy, and exposure alone cannot tell them apart. Applying the Richmond (202...