Skip to main content

I just read through the Agreement and it sounds promising. Having studied the history of policy making in Zimbabwe, I am however curious as to how much gap there is going to be between the actual agreement and what is implemented. The agreement does address issues such as depoliticizing the National Youth Service, which has for long been abused to further ZANU PF’s agenda, mainly in the rural areas. The agreement also states that the Prime Minister, Morgan Tsvangirai will be part of the national Security Council, of which Mugabe is the chair. It should be remembered that this is the very machinery that masterminded the intimidation of the Movement for Democratic Change in the run up to the election. I look forward to seeing how this is going to play out.

My other bone of contention is the number of bodies in the executive branch; President Mugabe and two Vice Presidents, Prime Minister Tsvangirai and 2 Deputy Prime Ministers, making a grand total of 6 officers in the executive branch (excluding their staffers). While Mugabe maintains presidential power, his authority has somewhat been diminished. With an almost balanced representation in the house of assembly and ZANU – controlled senate, I foresee gridlock in the policy making process. Personally, I am not a fan of big government, especially considering that it is our tax dollars that pay for all these bodies.

In conclusion I would like to remind you that this is not the first unity government Zimbabweans have seen. In 1987, Mugabe’s ZANU-PF signed the Unity Accord with PF ZAPU, after the Ndebele massacres in the Gukurahundi. Many saw the deal as promising, but as we saw in the recent months, the government was behaving in a manner reminiscent of pre-1987. With that being said, I am somewhat hopeful of this particular one because, Zimbabwe really needs to move on, there has been too much hurt and poverty. Let us hope the gap between policy making and policy implementation is not too wide. To that end, I concur with Denford that there needs to be active involvement of civil society through research organizations, human rights groups, think tanks, and other entities to uphold individual rights and the rule of law, and ensure that these don’t get thrown on the wayside as has been the case lately.

Comments

Post a Comment

Constructive feedback is always welcome. Thank you

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Core PCE inflation: A dual approach

Today's release of the August 2025 Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation data drew widespread media attention, with coverage highlighting both the persistence of inflation and its implications for Federal Reserve policy. Across outlets, analysts pointed to resilient consumer spending and income growth as signs of underlying economic strength, even as inflation remains above the Fed's 2% target. The consensus among media reports is that while inflation is not worsening, its stubbornness continues to challenge policymakers navigating a softening labor market and evolving rate expectations. To provide deeper insights into inflation's trajectory, I've developed a forecasting framework that combines two econometric approaches — ARIMA time series modeling and Phillips Curve analysis—to predict Core PCE inflation. This analysis presents a unique opportunity to validate my forecasting methodology against eight months of 2025 data. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mapping the Blast Radius: What Happens When the "World's Factory" Stops?

In global trade, "efficiency" often masks "fragility." We know that China is central to the global electronics supply chain, but how central? And if that node were to go dark, who would feel the shockwaves first? To answer this, I moved beyond standard trade statistics and built a network simulation using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) Tables (2023 Edition) . This dataset maps the DNA of the global economy, tracking every dollar of input across 66 countries and 45 industries. 1. The Blast Radius: Tracing the Contagion I treated the global economy as a directed graph and simulated a total supply shock to Chinese Electronics (CHN_C26) . By tracing the flow of inputs across three tiers of buyers, I visualized the "Blast Radius" of this disruption. Fig 1: The Supply Chain Cascade. The shock originates in China (Red) and immediately hits "Tier 1" assembly hubs (Dark Blue) before cascading to global consumers...
Post a Comment
Read more

Turkey's Informality Tax

A general-equilibrium model of Turkey's dual labour market says the cost of taxing formal work doesn't show up where we usually look for it. The bottomline: Making Turkey's transfer to the unemployed a third more generous raises unemployment from 8.6% to 9.2% . That is the honest cost, and it is not large. How you pay for it matters more than whether you pay for it. Funded by payroll taxes, the poor end up 0.6% worse off than before the transfer was raised — the policy defeats itself. Funded by VAT, they are 0.5% better off . The reason is not unemployment, which is nearly identical under both. It is informality . A higher payroll tax pushes formal jobs into the unregistered sector, where the wage is 43% lower and nothing is taxed. Turkey is not on the wrong side of the payroll-tax Laffer curve — revenue peaks around 53%, well above today's ~37.5% wedge. But the marginal cost...
Post a Comment
Read more