Skip to main content

Who Really Owns the Factory? Mapping the Corporate Control of Global Trade

In my previous post, we looked at where value is created in the global economy. We saw how a "German" car is actually a European collaborative effort. But that map leaves one critical question unanswered: Who owns the factory?

Does a country own its own production, or is it merely a host for foreign capital? To answer this, I dove into the OECD Activity of Multinational Enterprises (AMNE) database. By distinguishing between domestic and foreign-owned firms, we can reveal the "hidden architecture" of corporate control.

1. The Sovereignty Gap: Who Relies on Foreign Capital?

The first metric I calculated is the Foreign Penetration Ratio: the percentage of a nation's total Gross Value Added (GVA) that is generated by foreign-controlled affiliates.

The results reveal a stark divide in the global economy between "Sovereign Giants" and "Global Hubs."

Fig 1: The "Hubs" vs. The "Giants" — Share of National Value Added by Foreign Firms (2020)

Key Insights:

  • The "Hub" Model (Top of Chart): Countries like Ireland (43.8%), Hong Kong, and Singapore are effectively platforms for global capital. Their high ratios indicate that their economic engines are driven primarily by foreign multinationals.
  • "Factory Europe" (Middle): Notice the cluster of Central European nations: Slovakia (32.0%), Czech Republic (33.2%), and Hungary (32.5%). This confirms their role as the integrated manufacturing engine for Western Europe (primarily German automakers).
  • The "Sovereign" Giants (Bottom): In contrast, massive economies like Japan (3.8%), China (4.3%), and the USA (typically <10%) appear at the bottom. While they receive huge dollar amounts of investment, their domestic economies are so vast that foreign firms remain a small slice of the pie.

2. The "Dual Economy": Local vs. Export Platforms

Knowing that foreign firms are present is one thing. Knowing what they are doing is another. Are they here to sell to locals (Market Seeking), or are they using the country as a launchpad to export elsewhere (Efficiency Seeking)?

To find out, I calculated the Export Intensity Gap. This compares the percentage of output exported by foreign firms (Red) versus domestic firms (Blue).

Fig 2: The Export Platform Phenomenon — Foreign firms export significantly more than locals.
The Insight: In key manufacturing hubs like Ireland, Slovakia, and Vietnam, we see a massive "Export Gap." Foreign firms export 60-80% of what they make, while domestic firms export less than 20%.

This data visualizes the "Dual Economy" phenomenon. In these countries, foreign affiliates operate as "islands" of high-efficiency manufacturing connected to the global market, often with limited links to the domestic consumer economy. They are not built to serve the host country; they are built to serve the world from the host country.

3. The Matrix of Control: A Sectoral Deep Dive

National averages can hide the truth. To understand where this foreign control is concentrated, I generated a heatmap of Foreign Penetration by Sector. This visualization transforms the data into a "texture" of the global economy.

Fig 3: The Matrix of Control — Red indicates high foreign dominance (>80%), Blue indicates domestic control.

Reading this heatmap reveals three distinct economic architectures:

  • The "Vertical" Global Sectors (Right Side): Look at the far right of the heatmap. Sectors like Motor Vehicles (C29) and Pharmaceuticals (C21) form solid vertical bands of red/orange. This means these industries are highly globalized everywhere. It is rare to find a purely domestic car industry today.
  • The "Horizontal" Dependency (Bottom Rows): Look at Ireland (IRL) and Hungary (HUN) at the bottom. Their rows are predominantly orange and red across many sectors. This indicates broad-based foreign integration—from services to manufacturing, their entire economic model is plugged into global value chains.
  • The "Automotive Cluster" Hotspot: If you look specifically at the intersection of Slovakia (SVK) and Motor Vehicles (C29), you see a deep red block (often >90%). This confirms Slovakia’s status as the world’s per-capita car production leader, a sector almost entirely driven by foreign capital.

Conclusion

Combining TiVA (flows) and AMNE (ownership) gives us a complete picture. "Factory World" is not just about moving parts across borders; it's about strategic control. For the "Hub" economies at the top of our chart, national prosperity is deeply linked to their ability to remain attractive to these global corporate networks.

Comments

Post a Comment

Constructive feedback is always welcome. Thank you

Popular posts from this blog

Mapping the Blast Radius: What Happens When the "World's Factory" Stops?

In global trade, "efficiency" often masks "fragility." We know that China is central to the global electronics supply chain, but how central? And if that node were to go dark, who would feel the shockwaves first? To answer this, I moved beyond standard trade statistics and built a network simulation using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) Tables (2023 Edition) . This dataset maps the DNA of the global economy, tracking every dollar of input across 66 countries and 45 industries. 1. The Blast Radius: Tracing the Contagion I treated the global economy as a directed graph and simulated a total supply shock to Chinese Electronics (CHN_C26) . By tracing the flow of inputs across three tiers of buyers, I visualized the "Blast Radius" of this disruption. Fig 1: The Supply Chain Cascade. The shock originates in China (Red) and immediately hits "Tier 1" assembly hubs (Dark Blue) before cascading to global consumers...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Labor Market Impacts of AI in Türkiye: Beyond Occupational Exposure Analysis

Beyond Exposure AI and Labor Markets · Türkiye Occupational exposure to AI identifies where technology may affect work, but not whether employment will contract, reorganize, or expand. Applying the Richmond (2026) AI Jobs Transition Framework to Türkiye's 2024 Household Labour Force Survey, the dominant high-exposure archetype is not automation. It is reorganization. Mpumelelo Nxumalo and Dhushyanth Raju · Summary of the working paper Beyond Exposure: AI and Labor Market Reorganization in Türkiye Most discussion of AI and jobs runs on a single number: how much of an occupation's task content a model can perform. That number identifies where technology reaches. It does not say what happens next. An exposed occupation may shed workers, or it may keep them while the work itself is rebuilt around the technology. Those are different outcomes, they call for different policy, and exposure alone cannot tell them apart. Applying the Richmond (202...
Post a Comment
Read more

Turkey's Informality Tax

A general-equilibrium model of Turkey's dual labour market says the cost of taxing formal work doesn't show up where we usually look for it. The bottomline: Making Turkey's transfer to the unemployed a third more generous raises unemployment from 8.6% to 9.2% . That is the honest cost, and it is not large. How you pay for it matters more than whether you pay for it. Funded by payroll taxes, the poor end up 0.6% worse off than before the transfer was raised — the policy defeats itself. Funded by VAT, they are 0.5% better off . The reason is not unemployment, which is nearly identical under both. It is informality . A higher payroll tax pushes formal jobs into the unregistered sector, where the wage is 43% lower and nothing is taxed. Turkey is not on the wrong side of the payroll-tax Laffer curve — revenue peaks around 53%, well above today's ~37.5% wedge. But the marginal cost...
Post a Comment
Read more