Skip to main content

Should Zimbabwe consider a universal basic income scheme?

The IMF is supporting the Government of Zimbabwe as it carries out painful reforms, which will see a contraction of the wage bill, a reduction in agricultural input subsidies, rationalization of support to loss-making parastatals/state-owned enterprises (SOEs) among other priorities. These reforms are needed – Zimbabwe spends more on civil servant emoluments (82 percent of revenue) than the average Sub-Saharan African country (49.5 percent of revenue). SOEs have, in the past, engaged in the practice of acquiring companies that have non-performing loans in their balance sheets – effectively transferring debts onto public accounts, worsening Zimbabwe’s fiscal position.

While the Zimbabwean authorities are working to get the fiscal affairs in order there is need for substantial donor support for social protection. This includes programming meant to ease the cost of living for the poor and to provide a safety net when households and individuals fall into hard times, as indeed they will as fiscal cuts take effect. The international community should be working with the government to introduce a Universal Basic Income (UBI), funded by donors. This UBI should primarily be targeted at urban dwellers as existing social protection schemes (a school feeding program, a cash transfer scheme, a primary and secondary school education subsidy program among others) are largely aimed at rural households. In the May 2019 Staff Report by the IMF, the government has promised to maintain the floor of social spending. But effort is needed to better target this spending.

UBI experiments are ongoing in other parts of the world. In Kenya, researchers at Innovations for Poverty Action (IPA) have partnered with GiveDirectly to evaluate the effects of universal basic income on a wide range of economic and social outcomes.

In March 2016, the government of Ontario, Canada introduced a three-year pilot basic income program. 4,000 people were provided with monthly benefits to lift them to at least 75 percent of the poverty line (Bergstein 2018). Following a tax credit model, the Ontario basic income pilot ensured that participants received up to $16,989 per year for a single person, less 50 percent of any earned income; $24,027 per year for a couple, less 50 percent of any earned income. People with a disability received up to $500 per month on top. The Ontario experiment began to be wound down from March 2019.

UBI, an idea whose time has come (again), should be pursued as a social protection strategy for Zimbabwe. There is at present a confluence of events that make it opportune to do so. Zimbabwe’s mobile payments system (Eco-cash) allows for direct distribution of universal cash transfers to millions. The advent of platforms like GiveDirectly in Kenya, which make use of M-PESA to send cash transfers to individuals means there is precedence for such an approach in Zimbabwe. The protracted pain that Zimbabweans are yet to endure requires bold action to ensure that the much needed macro-fiscal SMP program succeeds.

[1] IMF (2001). Country Report No, 01/05

Comments

Post a Comment

Constructive feedback is always welcome. Thank you

Popular posts from this blog

Mapping the Blast Radius: What Happens When the "World's Factory" Stops?

In global trade, "efficiency" often masks "fragility." We know that China is central to the global electronics supply chain, but how central? And if that node were to go dark, who would feel the shockwaves first? To answer this, I moved beyond standard trade statistics and built a network simulation using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) Tables (2023 Edition) . This dataset maps the DNA of the global economy, tracking every dollar of input across 66 countries and 45 industries. 1. The Blast Radius: Tracing the Contagion I treated the global economy as a directed graph and simulated a total supply shock to Chinese Electronics (CHN_C26) . By tracing the flow of inputs across three tiers of buyers, I visualized the "Blast Radius" of this disruption. Fig 1: The Supply Chain Cascade. The shock originates in China (Red) and immediately hits "Tier 1" assembly hubs (Dark Blue) before cascading to global consumers...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Labor Market Impacts of AI in Türkiye: Beyond Occupational Exposure Analysis

Beyond Exposure AI and Labor Markets · Türkiye Occupational exposure to AI identifies where technology may affect work, but not whether employment will contract, reorganize, or expand. Applying the Richmond (2026) AI Jobs Transition Framework to Türkiye's 2024 Household Labour Force Survey, the dominant high-exposure archetype is not automation. It is reorganization. Mpumelelo Nxumalo and Dhushyanth Raju · Summary of the working paper Beyond Exposure: AI and Labor Market Reorganization in Türkiye Most discussion of AI and jobs runs on a single number: how much of an occupation's task content a model can perform. That number identifies where technology reaches. It does not say what happens next. An exposed occupation may shed workers, or it may keep them while the work itself is rebuilt around the technology. Those are different outcomes, they call for different policy, and exposure alone cannot tell them apart. Applying the Richmond (202...
Post a Comment
Read more

Turkey's Informality Tax

A general-equilibrium model of Turkey's dual labour market says the cost of taxing formal work doesn't show up where we usually look for it. The bottomline: Making Turkey's transfer to the unemployed a third more generous raises unemployment from 8.6% to 9.2% . That is the honest cost, and it is not large. How you pay for it matters more than whether you pay for it. Funded by payroll taxes, the poor end up 0.6% worse off than before the transfer was raised — the policy defeats itself. Funded by VAT, they are 0.5% better off . The reason is not unemployment, which is nearly identical under both. It is informality . A higher payroll tax pushes formal jobs into the unregistered sector, where the wage is 43% lower and nothing is taxed. Turkey is not on the wrong side of the payroll-tax Laffer curve — revenue peaks around 53%, well above today's ~37.5% wedge. But the marginal cost...
Post a Comment
Read more