Skip to main content

The Boardroom Web: Who Runs Corporate Malaysia?



This is a follow-up to my previous analysis of Malaysia's corporate ecosystem. While the last post looked at which companies own each other, this post zooms in on the people.

Using the same dataset, I mapped Interlocking Directorates—the extent to which individuals sit on the boards of multiple listed companies. This metric is often used to spot power brokers, conflicts of interest, and the "old boys' network" that directs the economy.
Figure 1: The web of Interlocking Board Memberships (2015).
Larger nodes = Individuals on more boards.

The "Super-Connector" Anomaly

The visualization highlights some extreme outliers in the data:
  • Max Board Seats: As of 2015, the most connected individual was listed in 54 companies (out of over 900 listed firms).
  • Max Board Size: The greatest number of individuals sitting on a single board was 15.

Who is the person sitting on 54 boards? Is this a tycoon with unprecedented control over the economy?

The Twist: The Company Secretary

It turns out, the "most powerful" node is likely not a tycoon, but a compliance officer.

According to the Malaysia Business Advisory, every registered company must appoint at least one Company Secretary—a licensed professional responsible for ensuring compliance with the Companies Act of 1965.

Because many firms outsource this role to professional services firms, a single licensed secretary often appears on dozens of filings. While they are central to the network graph, they do not necessarily drive strategic direction.
Next Steps: Filtering the Noise
To find the true strategic power brokers, I am currently building a new map that excludes Company Secretaries. This filtered view should reveal the genuine decision-makers and the true extent of corporate interlocking in Malaysia.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Constructive feedback is always welcome. Thank you

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Core PCE inflation: A dual approach

Today's release of the August 2025 Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation data drew widespread media attention, with coverage highlighting both the persistence of inflation and its implications for Federal Reserve policy. Across outlets, analysts pointed to resilient consumer spending and income growth as signs of underlying economic strength, even as inflation remains above the Fed's 2% target. The consensus among media reports is that while inflation is not worsening, its stubbornness continues to challenge policymakers navigating a softening labor market and evolving rate expectations. To provide deeper insights into inflation's trajectory, I've developed a forecasting framework that combines two econometric approaches — ARIMA time series modeling and Phillips Curve analysis—to predict Core PCE inflation. This analysis presents a unique opportunity to validate my forecasting methodology against eight months of 2025 data. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Minimum Wage Increases Really Kill Jobs? Evidence from the "Fight for $15" Era

The debate over minimum wage policy has raged for decades, with economists, policymakers, and business leaders offering sharply different predictions about its effects on employment. Critics warn that raising the minimum wage will force employers to cut jobs, while supporters argue that higher wages boost worker productivity and spending power. But what does the actual data tell us. Using a comprehensive difference-in-differences analysis and Federal Reserve Economic Data covering 43 U.S. states from 2012-2020 of the "Fight for $15" movement between 2012 and 2020, I provide some evidence about how minimum wage increases actually affect employment in the real world. The Perfect Natural Experiment The period from 2012 to 2020 provided economists with an ideal "natural experiment" to study minimum wage effects. Here's why this timeframe was perfect for analysis: Federal Stability : The federal minimum wage remained frozen at $7.25 per hour since 2009, creating ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mapping the Blast Radius: What Happens When the "World's Factory" Stops?

In global trade, "efficiency" often masks "fragility." We know that China is central to the global electronics supply chain, but how central? And if that node were to go dark, who would feel the shockwaves first? To answer this, I moved beyond standard trade statistics and built a network simulation using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) Tables (2023 Edition) . This dataset maps the DNA of the global economy, tracking every dollar of input across 66 countries and 45 industries. 1. The Blast Radius: Tracing the Contagion I treated the global economy as a directed graph and simulated a total supply shock to Chinese Electronics (CHN_C26) . By tracing the flow of inputs across three tiers of buyers, I visualized the "Blast Radius" of this disruption. Fig 1: The Supply Chain Cascade. The shock originates in China (Red) and immediately hits "Tier 1" assembly hubs (Dark Blue) before cascading to global consumers...
Post a Comment
Read more