Skip to main content

The Boardroom Web: Who Runs Corporate Malaysia?



This is a follow-up to my previous analysis of Malaysia's corporate ecosystem. While the last post looked at which companies own each other, this post zooms in on the people.

Using the same dataset, I mapped Interlocking Directorates—the extent to which individuals sit on the boards of multiple listed companies. This metric is often used to spot power brokers, conflicts of interest, and the "old boys' network" that directs the economy.
Figure 1: The web of Interlocking Board Memberships (2015).
Larger nodes = Individuals on more boards.

The "Super-Connector" Anomaly

The visualization highlights some extreme outliers in the data:
  • Max Board Seats: As of 2015, the most connected individual was listed in 54 companies (out of over 900 listed firms).
  • Max Board Size: The greatest number of individuals sitting on a single board was 15.

Who is the person sitting on 54 boards? Is this a tycoon with unprecedented control over the economy?

The Twist: The Company Secretary

It turns out, the "most powerful" node is likely not a tycoon, but a compliance officer.

According to the Malaysia Business Advisory, every registered company must appoint at least one Company Secretary—a licensed professional responsible for ensuring compliance with the Companies Act of 1965.

Because many firms outsource this role to professional services firms, a single licensed secretary often appears on dozens of filings. While they are central to the network graph, they do not necessarily drive strategic direction.
Next Steps: Filtering the Noise
To find the true strategic power brokers, I am currently building a new map that excludes Company Secretaries. This filtered view should reveal the genuine decision-makers and the true extent of corporate interlocking in Malaysia.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Constructive feedback is always welcome. Thank you

Popular posts from this blog

Mapping the Blast Radius: What Happens When the "World's Factory" Stops?

In global trade, "efficiency" often masks "fragility." We know that China is central to the global electronics supply chain, but how central? And if that node were to go dark, who would feel the shockwaves first? To answer this, I moved beyond standard trade statistics and built a network simulation using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) Tables (2023 Edition) . This dataset maps the DNA of the global economy, tracking every dollar of input across 66 countries and 45 industries. 1. The Blast Radius: Tracing the Contagion I treated the global economy as a directed graph and simulated a total supply shock to Chinese Electronics (CHN_C26) . By tracing the flow of inputs across three tiers of buyers, I visualized the "Blast Radius" of this disruption. Fig 1: The Supply Chain Cascade. The shock originates in China (Red) and immediately hits "Tier 1" assembly hubs (Dark Blue) before cascading to global consumers...
Post a Comment
Read more

Turkey's Informality Tax

A general-equilibrium model of Turkey's dual labour market says the cost of taxing formal work doesn't show up where we usually look for it. The bottomline: Making Turkey's transfer to the unemployed a third more generous raises unemployment from 8.6% to 9.2% . That is the honest cost, and it is not large. How you pay for it matters more than whether you pay for it. Funded by payroll taxes, the poor end up 0.6% worse off than before the transfer was raised — the policy defeats itself. Funded by VAT, they are 0.5% better off . The reason is not unemployment, which is nearly identical under both. It is informality . A higher payroll tax pushes formal jobs into the unregistered sector, where the wage is 43% lower and nothing is taxed. Turkey is not on the wrong side of the payroll-tax Laffer curve — revenue peaks around 53%, well above today's ~37.5% wedge. But the marginal cost...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Labor Market Impacts of AI in Türkiye: Beyond Occupational Exposure Analysis

Beyond Exposure AI and Labor Markets · Türkiye Occupational exposure to AI identifies where technology may affect work, but not whether employment will contract, reorganize, or expand. Applying the Richmond (2026) AI Jobs Transition Framework to Türkiye's 2024 Household Labour Force Survey, the dominant high-exposure archetype is not automation. It is reorganization. Mpumelelo Nxumalo and Dhushyanth Raju · Summary of the working paper Beyond Exposure: AI and Labor Market Reorganization in Türkiye Most discussion of AI and jobs runs on a single number: how much of an occupation's task content a model can perform. That number identifies where technology reaches. It does not say what happens next. An exposed occupation may shed workers, or it may keep them while the work itself is rebuilt around the technology. Those are different outcomes, they call for different policy, and exposure alone cannot tell them apart. Applying the Richmond (202...
Post a Comment
Read more