Skip to main content

The Invisible Handshake: Profits vs. Connectedness

Is it better to be smart or connected? In the world of Malaysian corporate finance, the answer might be "both."

Continuing with the theme of corporate connectedness, I have calculated various measures of network structure in Malaysia's listed companies to see if "social capital" translates into financial returns. I focus here on two metrics:
  • Degree: Simply the number of shareholders a company has. Think of this as raw popularity.
  • PageRank: Named after Google co-founder Larry Page, this algorithm ranks websites by importance. I applied this to the network of cross-shareholding to determine the quality of connections. A company owned by a major player (like Khazanah) gets a higher PageRank than one owned by obscure holding companies.

Figure 1: Visualizing the relationship between connectedness and returns.

The graph above confirms my hypothesis: importance attracts importance. Companies with high centrality are likely to receive more links from other nodes in the network, such as institutional investors.

Figure 2: Regression results for Returns on Shareholders' Funds (2015).

Does this matter for the bottom line?
I regressed Return on Shareholders' Funds (2015) against these network measures. The preliminary results (shown above) suggest a positive relationship: companies that are more central to the network tend to be more profitable.
The Chicken or the Egg?
This raises a question of causality. Are these companies profitable because they are well-connected (gaining access to resources), or are institutional investors simply good at picking winners?

Needless to say, there is an endogeneity problem here. Correlation is not causation. To determine if networking is a legitimate strategy for boosting ROI, I will need to use instrumental variables to isolate the direction of causality.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Constructive feedback is always welcome. Thank you

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Core PCE inflation: A dual approach

Today's release of the August 2025 Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation data drew widespread media attention, with coverage highlighting both the persistence of inflation and its implications for Federal Reserve policy. Across outlets, analysts pointed to resilient consumer spending and income growth as signs of underlying economic strength, even as inflation remains above the Fed's 2% target. The consensus among media reports is that while inflation is not worsening, its stubbornness continues to challenge policymakers navigating a softening labor market and evolving rate expectations. To provide deeper insights into inflation's trajectory, I've developed a forecasting framework that combines two econometric approaches — ARIMA time series modeling and Phillips Curve analysis—to predict Core PCE inflation. This analysis presents a unique opportunity to validate my forecasting methodology against eight months of 2025 data. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Minimum Wage Increases Really Kill Jobs? Evidence from the "Fight for $15" Era

The debate over minimum wage policy has raged for decades, with economists, policymakers, and business leaders offering sharply different predictions about its effects on employment. Critics warn that raising the minimum wage will force employers to cut jobs, while supporters argue that higher wages boost worker productivity and spending power. But what does the actual data tell us. Using a comprehensive difference-in-differences analysis and Federal Reserve Economic Data covering 43 U.S. states from 2012-2020 of the "Fight for $15" movement between 2012 and 2020, I provide some evidence about how minimum wage increases actually affect employment in the real world. The Perfect Natural Experiment The period from 2012 to 2020 provided economists with an ideal "natural experiment" to study minimum wage effects. Here's why this timeframe was perfect for analysis: Federal Stability : The federal minimum wage remained frozen at $7.25 per hour since 2009, creating ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mapping the Matrix: Malaysia's Corporate Network

The complex interconnections that define modern society are readily visible in our Facebook or LinkedIn networks. But what about the corporate world? I recently began mapping the web of cross-shareholding among Malaysia's listed corporations. Using Social Network Analysis (SNA), I visualized the ecosystem to identify key "communities" and power brokers. The goal? To see if a company's position in this web predicts its financial destiny. The State of Play (2015) Figure 1: Malaysia's Corporate Network in 2015 (Created via Gephi) The map above visualizes the network as of 2015. While I have excluded specific company names, the "super-nodes" (the largest circles) represent the most connected shareholders in the economy—primarily government-linked investment companies (GLICs), fund managers, and international asset managers. A Decade of Growing Complexity ...
2 comments
Read more