"Winner Take All" By Dambisa Moyo, A Must Read!

I recently read Dambisa Moyo's Winner Take All: China's Race for Resources and What it Means for the World. The book is a thorough review of the resource landscape - from water to land to energy, and what China's drive to acquire these means for the West and the developing world including Africa. Moyo conducts due diligence on the contentious issue of land grabs of African farmland by states that are seeking to grow crops for food and energy as alternatives to oil.

"This puts food and energy in direct competition, given that the grain required to fill a 25 gallon (95 liter) fuel tank with ethanol could instead feed one person for an entire year."

Given the finite extent of arable land, Moyo, argues that the above means one thing for food prices - they can only go up! The food security picture is even more dire when we consider that of the 1 billion people that go hungry each day, a third live in Africa, yet the latter is home to much of the remaining untilled arable land. I believe Moyo provides a compelling call for action by African leaders when negotiating long term resource deals with other countries.

Moyo dispels as unfounded fears that China's involvement in the developing world, particularly Africa, is akin colonialism. Indeed, when one looks at the way China relates to Africa, it in no way resembles the way the British colonized African countries. Moreover she finds scant evidence that when China sets up shop in an African country it always brings its own labor force. She argues that there could be a negative correlation between available skills and the share of Chinese workers in a Chinese company in Africa. The onus is on Africa to ready its people by investing in skills acquisition! By debunking these myths, I believe the book invites one to look at China in a new, fairer light as a realist country looking out for its own in world of rapidly depleting resources.

Update: Watch Moyo talk about Sino-Africa relations on CNN

Comments

Mapping the Blast Radius: What Happens When the "World's Factory" Stops?

In global trade, "efficiency" often masks "fragility." We know that China is central to the global electronics supply chain, but how central? And if that node were to go dark, who would feel the shockwaves first? To answer this, I moved beyond standard trade statistics and built a network simulation using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) Tables (2023 Edition) . This dataset maps the DNA of the global economy, tracking every dollar of input across 66 countries and 45 industries. 1. The Blast Radius: Tracing the Contagion I treated the global economy as a directed graph and simulated a total supply shock to Chinese Electronics (CHN_C26) . By tracing the flow of inputs across three tiers of buyers, I visualized the "Blast Radius" of this disruption. Fig 1: The Supply Chain Cascade. The shock originates in China (Red) and immediately hits "Tier 1" assembly hubs (Dark Blue) before cascading to global consumers...

Turkey's Informality Tax

A general-equilibrium model of Turkey's dual labour market says the cost of taxing formal work doesn't show up where we usually look for it. The bottomline: Making Turkey's transfer to the unemployed a third more generous raises unemployment from 8.6% to 9.2% . That is the honest cost, and it is not large. How you pay for it matters more than whether you pay for it. Funded by payroll taxes, the poor end up 0.6% worse off than before the transfer was raised — the policy defeats itself. Funded by VAT, they are 0.5% better off . The reason is not unemployment, which is nearly identical under both. It is informality . A higher payroll tax pushes formal jobs into the unregistered sector, where the wage is 43% lower and nothing is taxed. Turkey is not on the wrong side of the payroll-tax Laffer curve — revenue peaks around 53%, well above today's ~37.5% wedge. But the marginal cost...

The Labor Market Impacts of AI in Türkiye: Beyond Occupational Exposure Analysis

Beyond Exposure AI and Labor Markets · Türkiye Occupational exposure to AI identifies where technology may affect work, but not whether employment will contract, reorganize, or expand. Applying the Richmond (2026) AI Jobs Transition Framework to Türkiye's 2024 Household Labour Force Survey, the dominant high-exposure archetype is not automation. It is reorganization. Mpumelelo Nxumalo and Dhushyanth Raju · Summary of the working paper Beyond Exposure: AI and Labor Market Reorganization in Türkiye Most discussion of AI and jobs runs on a single number: how much of an occupation's task content a model can perform. That number identifies where technology reaches. It does not say what happens next. An exposed occupation may shed workers, or it may keep them while the work itself is rebuilt around the technology. Those are different outcomes, they call for different policy, and exposure alone cannot tell them apart. Applying the Richmond (202...