Skip to main content

Hello from Saigon

I am currently working at the Fulbright Economics Teaching Program in Ho Chi Minh City with my MPA/ID classmate from the Kennedy School. It has been a week since we started and I thought it best to collect a few thoughts about this amazing place.


I decided to spend my summer in Vietnam not only to study the country's economics but also expose myself to  one of the most fascinating places on earth. Vietnam is a long S-shaped country in South east Asia bordering Laos and Cambodia to the west and China to the north. The entire eastern part of the country is coastline off the South China sea. The country comprises 63 provinces including Ha noi (the capital) and Ho Chi Minh City (Saigon) - the economic engine of Vietnam. Vietnam is classified as a lower-middle income country by the World Bank. The country has come a long way since the implementation of the Doi Moi (renovation) reforms, which initiated the process to turn Vietnam into a market economy. The authorities recognize the challenges ahead including averting the middle income trap and continue to work to make Vietnam globally competitive industrialized country.

While comparisons are fraught with the usual validity challenges it is useful to benchmark Vietnam vis-a-vis its Asian neighbors. The East Asian countries come to mind as well as Vietnam's South East Asian neighbors. (Much of the commentary here is informed by various readings from the Ash Program at HKS as well as musings from my research on industrialization). 

As a late comer to the industrialization game, Vietnam stands to benefit from the experiences of South Korea and Taiwan. More specifically, a common feature of industrial policy of the East Asian 'tigers' (or what the late Alice Amsden calls 'The Rest') was the principle of reciprocity. This means in their goals of becoming national leaders, companies receiving subsidy support from the state were required to export a certain amount of what they produced. Failure to do so often resulted in loss of state support. What this means for Vietnam, as it plans to industrialize is to continuously enforce this principle, particularly with regard to the state owned enterprises (SOEs). 

An example for Vietnam would be the Thai Board of investment (BOI), whose principle of reciprocity was enforced in what Alice Amsden ('The Rise of the Rest' (2004)) calls the New Control Mechanism. More specifically, the relationship between the BOI and the company receiving support was characterized by clear performance criteria. These not only included quantitative limits but also permeated management of the company. Such monitoring is particularly warranted in the case of Vietnam given that the SOE sector is relatively large.

An important caveat to the above is that the reciprocal control mechanisms applied in the Rest were used during the GATT era and would be less possible today under the WTO regime. But I would argue, as does Amsden (2000), that there still exists room within the WTO regime to carry out industrial policy in a similar manner as did the East Asian tigers. Countries acceding to the WTO have a window period to reduce  barriers to trade within which many of the control mechanisms would work. More importantly a careful analysis of the bulk of the New Control Mechanisms do not violate WTO law and can still be carried out today as countries industrialize. 

Feedback is always welcome

---
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ABOVE ARE MY OWN AND DO NOT REFLECT VIEWS OF THE FULBRIGHT ECONOMICS TEACHING PROGRAM OR  HARVARD UNIVERSITY.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mapping the Blast Radius: What Happens When the "World's Factory" Stops?

In global trade, "efficiency" often masks "fragility." We know that China is central to the global electronics supply chain, but how central? And if that node were to go dark, who would feel the shockwaves first? To answer this, I moved beyond standard trade statistics and built a network simulation using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) Tables (2023 Edition) . This dataset maps the DNA of the global economy, tracking every dollar of input across 66 countries and 45 industries. 1. The Blast Radius: Tracing the Contagion I treated the global economy as a directed graph and simulated a total supply shock to Chinese Electronics (CHN_C26) . By tracing the flow of inputs across three tiers of buyers, I visualized the "Blast Radius" of this disruption. Fig 1: The Supply Chain Cascade. The shock originates in China (Red) and immediately hits "Tier 1" assembly hubs (Dark Blue) before cascading to global consumers...

Turkey's Informality Tax

A general-equilibrium model of Turkey's dual labour market says the cost of taxing formal work doesn't show up where we usually look for it. The bottomline: Making Turkey's transfer to the unemployed a third more generous raises unemployment from 8.6% to 9.2% . That is the honest cost, and it is not large. How you pay for it matters more than whether you pay for it. Funded by payroll taxes, the poor end up 0.6% worse off than before the transfer was raised — the policy defeats itself. Funded by VAT, they are 0.5% better off . The reason is not unemployment, which is nearly identical under both. It is informality . A higher payroll tax pushes formal jobs into the unregistered sector, where the wage is 43% lower and nothing is taxed. Turkey is not on the wrong side of the payroll-tax Laffer curve — revenue peaks around 53%, well above today's ~37.5% wedge. But the marginal cost...

The Labor Market Impacts of AI in Türkiye: Beyond Occupational Exposure Analysis

Beyond Exposure AI and Labor Markets · Türkiye Occupational exposure to AI identifies where technology may affect work, but not whether employment will contract, reorganize, or expand. Applying the Richmond (2026) AI Jobs Transition Framework to Türkiye's 2024 Household Labour Force Survey, the dominant high-exposure archetype is not automation. It is reorganization. Mpumelelo Nxumalo and Dhushyanth Raju · Summary of the working paper Beyond Exposure: AI and Labor Market Reorganization in Türkiye Most discussion of AI and jobs runs on a single number: how much of an occupation's task content a model can perform. That number identifies where technology reaches. It does not say what happens next. An exposed occupation may shed workers, or it may keep them while the work itself is rebuilt around the technology. Those are different outcomes, they call for different policy, and exposure alone cannot tell them apart. Applying the Richmond (202...