Skip to main content

Why Nations Fail

One of the many things I learned from graduate school was the importance of having a theoretical framework within which to situate a perceived problem you seek to address. Not every problem is amenable to such conceptual grounding so it is worth articulating one for yourself so that you don't get led astray in your pursuit of feasible policies. Many of the issues I discuss in my blog can be viewed from policy frameworks used in public policy schools. Other frameworks I have had to acquire from personal research. To that end, one book that I think will stand the test of time is Why Nations Fail by Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson (2012). The key message in this tome (it is 546 pages long) is that nations fail because their extractive economic institutions do not create the incentives needed for people to save, invest, and innovate. Extractive political institutions support these economic institutions by cementing the power of those who benefit from the extraction. Extractive economic and political institutions, though their details vary under different circumstances, are always at the root of failure (372).

Inclusive Political Institutions
Exclusive Political Institutions
Inclusive Economic Institutions

Virtuous
Cycle

Unstable
Equilibrium
Exclusive Economic Institutions

Unstable
Equilibrium

Vicious
Cycle

Acemoglu and Robinson (2012) convincingly argue that countries today have gone through watershed moments in their histories–critical junctures to use their terminology and the way the prevailing coalitions and actors responded to those critical junctures explains much of the country's institutional evolution. For example, the end of colonialism can be considered a critical juncture for many former colonies which find themselves mired in nuances of texts written to negotiate their freedom. The end of colonial subjugation in many cases marked the transition toward inclusivity as the governing parties under colonialism often served as extractive elements linking the colony to some crown in Europe.

Combining this institutional framework with other economic theories such as middle income trap can help one make sense of the goings on in so called emerging markets. If the recent civil unrests in Hong Kong, Myanmar, Brazil, Indonesia, Turkey, to name a few are any indication it is that as societies become richer, the masses will demand greater voice and accountability, i.e., inclusive political institutions. Steps towards political inclusivity could comprise clarifying and ensuring property rights, particularly with regard to land user rights; participatory democracy; broader alliance between government, citizens and business in policy dialogue; creating an accountable administration; free media; effective monitoring of elected bodies; independence of the judiciary as well as regulatory agencies among others. 

Either way, this institutional framework allows me to situate perceived problems in a country and approximate likely context-fitting policies to facilitate greater inclusion. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Core PCE inflation: A dual approach

Today's release of the August 2025 Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation data drew widespread media attention, with coverage highlighting both the persistence of inflation and its implications for Federal Reserve policy. Across outlets, analysts pointed to resilient consumer spending and income growth as signs of underlying economic strength, even as inflation remains above the Fed's 2% target. The consensus among media reports is that while inflation is not worsening, its stubbornness continues to challenge policymakers navigating a softening labor market and evolving rate expectations. To provide deeper insights into inflation's trajectory, I've developed a forecasting framework that combines two econometric approaches — ARIMA time series modeling and Phillips Curve analysis—to predict Core PCE inflation. This analysis presents a unique opportunity to validate my forecasting methodology against eight months of 2025 data. ...

Mapping the Blast Radius: What Happens When the "World's Factory" Stops?

In global trade, "efficiency" often masks "fragility." We know that China is central to the global electronics supply chain, but how central? And if that node were to go dark, who would feel the shockwaves first? To answer this, I moved beyond standard trade statistics and built a network simulation using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) Tables (2023 Edition) . This dataset maps the DNA of the global economy, tracking every dollar of input across 66 countries and 45 industries. 1. The Blast Radius: Tracing the Contagion I treated the global economy as a directed graph and simulated a total supply shock to Chinese Electronics (CHN_C26) . By tracing the flow of inputs across three tiers of buyers, I visualized the "Blast Radius" of this disruption. Fig 1: The Supply Chain Cascade. The shock originates in China (Red) and immediately hits "Tier 1" assembly hubs (Dark Blue) before cascading to global consumers...

Turkey's Informality Tax

A general-equilibrium model of Turkey's dual labour market says the cost of taxing formal work doesn't show up where we usually look for it. The bottomline: Making Turkey's transfer to the unemployed a third more generous raises unemployment from 8.6% to 9.2% . That is the honest cost, and it is not large. How you pay for it matters more than whether you pay for it. Funded by payroll taxes, the poor end up 0.6% worse off than before the transfer was raised — the policy defeats itself. Funded by VAT, they are 0.5% better off . The reason is not unemployment, which is nearly identical under both. It is informality . A higher payroll tax pushes formal jobs into the unregistered sector, where the wage is 43% lower and nothing is taxed. Turkey is not on the wrong side of the payroll-tax Laffer curve — revenue peaks around 53%, well above today's ~37.5% wedge. But the marginal cost...