Skip to main content

Macroeconomic Tail Risks: Malaysia

In a recent post on the World Economic Forum website (See here), Daron Acemoglu summarizes findings from his recent work on what really causes economic downturns. His focus is on the US economy and starts by showing that the distribution of post war growth in America has generally not followed the normal distribution. I was curious what this would look like for Malaysia (where I am currently working) so I ran the Normal Q-Q Plot in R and this is what I found.

Data from the World Bank's WDI database

Malaysian real per capita income growth between 1960 and 2013 has largely followed a normal distribution but there are significant tail risks. The plot above shows that large negative downturns are more common than the standard normal distribution would suggest. The downturns correspond,  in descending order of severity, to 1998 (Asian Financial Crisis), 1985 (Commodity Shock), 2009 (Great Recession), 1986 (Commodity Shock continued), 2001 (Dot Com Bust), and 1975 (1st oil shock).

Acemoglu et al (2015) conclude that "the frequency and depth of such downturns [in the US & advanced countries] may depend on the interaction between microeconomic firm-level shocks and the nature of input-output linkages across different firms. This is due to the fact that the propagation of shocks over input-output linkages can lead to the concentration of tail risks in the economy."

I will not venture to speculate too much as to the causes of the deep deviations from normality at the negative tail end observed in Malaysia. This may be covered in a more involved growth diagnosis for the country. Suffice it to say that the downturns largely emanate from the global economic environment and exacerbate domestic micro economic weaknesses. What is interesting about the above finding for Malaysia is that only large negative downturns appear to be common with no corresponding outliers on the positive side. Contrast that with the untruncated graph for post-war US in Acemoglu's post.

A bit more on the origins of Malaysia's downturns:

1974/5: US and global recession was triggered by a tripling of the price of oil following the Yom Kippur war, and by the oil embargo that followed.

1984/6: The high-interest rate policy in the US resulted in a collapse of world commodity trade: Malaysia’s export price index fell by 30% due to sharp declines in tin and palm oil prices.

1997/8: When the Thai baht came under speculative attack in mid May, the ringgit also experienced heavy selling pressure.

2001: The bursting of the dot com bubble led to low external demand for Malaysia’s electronics and other exports.

2008/9: Resulted in trade shock for Malaysia; sharp fall in share prices; and an exodus of short term capital flows. Manufacturing output contracted by about 15% in 2009.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Constructive feedback is always welcome. Thank you

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Core PCE inflation: A dual approach

Today's release of the August 2025 Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation data drew widespread media attention, with coverage highlighting both the persistence of inflation and its implications for Federal Reserve policy. Across outlets, analysts pointed to resilient consumer spending and income growth as signs of underlying economic strength, even as inflation remains above the Fed's 2% target. The consensus among media reports is that while inflation is not worsening, its stubbornness continues to challenge policymakers navigating a softening labor market and evolving rate expectations. To provide deeper insights into inflation's trajectory, I've developed a forecasting framework that combines two econometric approaches — ARIMA time series modeling and Phillips Curve analysis—to predict Core PCE inflation. This analysis presents a unique opportunity to validate my forecasting methodology against eight months of 2025 data. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Minimum Wage Increases Really Kill Jobs? Evidence from the "Fight for $15" Era

The debate over minimum wage policy has raged for decades, with economists, policymakers, and business leaders offering sharply different predictions about its effects on employment. Critics warn that raising the minimum wage will force employers to cut jobs, while supporters argue that higher wages boost worker productivity and spending power. But what does the actual data tell us. Using a comprehensive difference-in-differences analysis and Federal Reserve Economic Data covering 43 U.S. states from 2012-2020 of the "Fight for $15" movement between 2012 and 2020, I provide some evidence about how minimum wage increases actually affect employment in the real world. The Perfect Natural Experiment The period from 2012 to 2020 provided economists with an ideal "natural experiment" to study minimum wage effects. Here's why this timeframe was perfect for analysis: Federal Stability : The federal minimum wage remained frozen at $7.25 per hour since 2009, creating ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Malaysia at a Cross Roads: Diagnosing the Constraints to High Income Status

Malaysia at a Crossroads: Diagnosing Constraints to High-Income Status In 2008, Malaysia was recognized by the Growth Commission – a distinguished panel comprising 2 Nobel Prize Winning Economists and other leading development practitioners – as one of thirteen countries that sustained high growth in the post-war period. The 30-year stretch that caught the attention of the Growth Commission was between 1967 and 1997 when Malaysia grew at an average of 7.3% per year. This long stretch of growth was interrupted by periods of external shocks including the Volcker shock of 1986, the Asian Financial crisis in 1997/8, later the so-called Dot Com Bubble of 2001, and more recently the Global Financial Crisis of 2008. Despite these shocks, Malaysia remained resilient - formally earning the title "Upper Middle Income Country" in 1992. (See summary figure that breaks down the country's per capita growth story). As...
2 comments
Read more