Skip to main content

Presenting Volume IX of the Africa Policy Journal


Order here.

I am excited to present the ninth edition of the Africa Policy Journal. I am grateful to those who helped make it a success. Bakary Seckan, the former Editor-in-Chief made the transition seamless. Timothy Cheston, Tomoo Okubu, and Sarah Glavey helped publicize the Journal to the greater Harvard community and recruit new editors at the 2013 Student Club Fair sponsored by the Kennedy School Student Government (KSSG). We worked closely with both KSSG and Student Services to publicize and finance our activities. I am particularly grateful to Joyce Hahn, APJ’s Managing Editor whose fundraising skills and management prowess made this edition a reality. I thank the following editors for their commitment to APJ throughout the year: Elizabeth Bennett, Aubrey Merpi, Ngozika Amalu, Kimberly Fernandes, Tim Cheston, Sarah Glavey, Tomoo Okubu, Ding Xu, and Bhekinkosi Sibanda.

We launched our 2014 Call for Submissions on October 15th 2013. We reached a diverse audience through our website and Facebook page. We received many submissions including book reviews, Op-Eds, and academic articles. We successfully solicited high profile interviews, one with the former PM of Niger and CEO of the New Partnership for African Development (NEPAD), Dr. Ibrahim Assane Mayaki, and the other with UN Resident Coordinator in South Sudan Ms. Lise Grande. Both interviews are featured in this volume. Needless to say, we could not publish all of the submissions but we were encouraged by the breadth of participation. The rest of the submissions that were not included in the print edition will be posted on our website.

Notwithstanding these successes, there were also challenges. In a bid to ensure sustainability of focus, we sought to create an Advisory Board comprising opinion makers from Africa but we had limited success in that regard. In hindsight, a more targeted and more realistic campaign might have yielded greater success and we leave this as a challenge to the next team. I believe an Advisory Board would greatly enhance our efforts to reach an even wider network and ensure APJ’s sustained presence in African policy debates.

I would be remiss if I did not mention the passing of one of Africa’s most venerable heroes, Nelson Mandela in early December, 2013. The Economist magazine put it best when it said that the passing of Mandela “diminishes us all”. This edition of the Africa Policy Journal features several commentaries on governance and the search for leadership in Africa. As you read through, for example, Professor Frankel’s Op-Ed on the Mo Ibrahim Prize for African Leaders or the interview with Dr. Mayaki as he discusses the importance of leadership in Africa’s future, I urge you to contemplate on the urgency of this topic in light on Mandela’s passing.

I am confident that the Africa Policy Journal will continue to be an important mouthpiece for those who are as excited about Africa’s future as we are.

Thank you for your support.

Mpumelelo (Lelo) NXUMALO
Editor-in-Chief, 2013–2014

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mapping the Blast Radius: What Happens When the "World's Factory" Stops?

In global trade, "efficiency" often masks "fragility." We know that China is central to the global electronics supply chain, but how central? And if that node were to go dark, who would feel the shockwaves first? To answer this, I moved beyond standard trade statistics and built a network simulation using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) Tables (2023 Edition) . This dataset maps the DNA of the global economy, tracking every dollar of input across 66 countries and 45 industries. 1. The Blast Radius: Tracing the Contagion I treated the global economy as a directed graph and simulated a total supply shock to Chinese Electronics (CHN_C26) . By tracing the flow of inputs across three tiers of buyers, I visualized the "Blast Radius" of this disruption. Fig 1: The Supply Chain Cascade. The shock originates in China (Red) and immediately hits "Tier 1" assembly hubs (Dark Blue) before cascading to global consumers...

Turkey's Informality Tax

A general-equilibrium model of Turkey's dual labour market says the cost of taxing formal work doesn't show up where we usually look for it. The bottomline: Making Turkey's transfer to the unemployed a third more generous raises unemployment from 8.6% to 9.2% . That is the honest cost, and it is not large. How you pay for it matters more than whether you pay for it. Funded by payroll taxes, the poor end up 0.6% worse off than before the transfer was raised — the policy defeats itself. Funded by VAT, they are 0.5% better off . The reason is not unemployment, which is nearly identical under both. It is informality . A higher payroll tax pushes formal jobs into the unregistered sector, where the wage is 43% lower and nothing is taxed. Turkey is not on the wrong side of the payroll-tax Laffer curve — revenue peaks around 53%, well above today's ~37.5% wedge. But the marginal cost...

The Labor Market Impacts of AI in Türkiye: Beyond Occupational Exposure Analysis

Beyond Exposure AI and Labor Markets · Türkiye Occupational exposure to AI identifies where technology may affect work, but not whether employment will contract, reorganize, or expand. Applying the Richmond (2026) AI Jobs Transition Framework to Türkiye's 2024 Household Labour Force Survey, the dominant high-exposure archetype is not automation. It is reorganization. Mpumelelo Nxumalo and Dhushyanth Raju · Summary of the working paper Beyond Exposure: AI and Labor Market Reorganization in Türkiye Most discussion of AI and jobs runs on a single number: how much of an occupation's task content a model can perform. That number identifies where technology reaches. It does not say what happens next. An exposed occupation may shed workers, or it may keep them while the work itself is rebuilt around the technology. Those are different outcomes, they call for different policy, and exposure alone cannot tell them apart. Applying the Richmond (202...