Skip to main content

Admissions decisions trickling in

I applied to 12 Economics programs, 8 PhDs, 2 MAs and Harvard's Master in International Development program. I have heard from 6 schools. I will be posting the outcome after all the decisions have come in.

However as decisions have been coming in I have also been thinking about what I would really like to do. 5 or just 2 more years of schooling? Needless to say forfeiting paid work to get an education is a bold but commendable thing to do. If I were to matriculate into a PhD program it would have to be one that enables me to merge my interests in finance and economics - much like the financial economics program at Booth or International Economics and Finance at the International Business School at Brandeis. Those who know me well know that I spent my final year at Hampshire college researching financial deepening in Africa. My stint at the IMF has also piqued my interest in macro-financial linkages especially in the aftermath of the Great Recession. There exists so much information about these and other topics that I believe can sustain my interest for 5 years.

On the other hand a Masters in Economics would make me more competitive in the job market but only as long as there is no PhD vying for the same position. I would have more flexibility than I currently do. Of course, not all MAs are created the same: NYU's is one of the best in the country in-terms of preparing economists for the job market. The Kennedy school's MPAID program needless to say, is very respectable. I work with an alum who sings praises all the time :)

You may be wondering how it is that I can blog during this tense period. Well, I have discovered that checking gradcafe.com incessantly for other students to post their admissions results is the worst thing to do while you wait for graduate programs to email you. I nearly collapsed when I saw that my dream school had already sent acceptance emails and I still had not gotten anything. Oops..

An email just popped up on my outlook...gotta check

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unemployment by state in the USA

Below is a visualization of unemployment rates by county using a powerful Python library called Bokeh . The two maps are for the states of Texas and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. As the second largest economy in the United States (10th largest in the world), Texas shows interesting county variation in macroeconomic factors such as unemployment. According to Wikipedia , in 2015, Texas was home to six of the top 50 companies on the Fortune 500 list and 51 overall (third most after New York and California). The northern counties were least affected by the financial crisis of 2008/09. Dallas–Fort Worth–Arlington area encompasses 13 counties which constitute the economic and cultural hub of the region commonly called North Texas or North Central Texas. Bokeh Plot The least affected counties in Massachusetts were the southernmost tourist areas of Nantuckett and Dukes County. The ...

Modeling Core PCE inflation: A dual approach

Today's release of the August 2025 Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation data drew widespread media attention, with coverage highlighting both the persistence of inflation and its implications for Federal Reserve policy. Across outlets, analysts pointed to resilient consumer spending and income growth as signs of underlying economic strength, even as inflation remains above the Fed's 2% target. The consensus among media reports is that while inflation is not worsening, its stubbornness continues to challenge policymakers navigating a softening labor market and evolving rate expectations. To provide deeper insights into inflation's trajectory, I've developed a forecasting framework that combines two econometric approaches — ARIMA time series modeling and Phillips Curve analysis—to predict Core PCE inflation. This analysis presents a unique opportunity to validate my forecasting methodology against eight months of 2025 data. ...

Do Minimum Wage Increases Really Kill Jobs? Evidence from the "Fight for $15" Era

The debate over minimum wage policy has raged for decades, with economists, policymakers, and business leaders offering sharply different predictions about its effects on employment. Critics warn that raising the minimum wage will force employers to cut jobs, while supporters argue that higher wages boost worker productivity and spending power. But what does the actual data tell us. Using a comprehensive difference-in-differences analysis and Federal Reserve Economic Data covering 43 U.S. states from 2012-2020 of the "Fight for $15" movement between 2012 and 2020, I provide some evidence about how minimum wage increases actually affect employment in the real world. The Perfect Natural Experiment The period from 2012 to 2020 provided economists with an ideal "natural experiment" to study minimum wage effects. Here's why this timeframe was perfect for analysis: Federal Stability : The federal minimum wage remained frozen at $7.25 per hour since 2009, creating ...