Skip to main content

Understanding US PMI as a Leading Indicator: Correlation Analysis GDP

How well do quarterly changes in PMI predict economic growth? An analysis of 10+ years of data (Q1 2015 - Q3 2025)

When it comes to tracking economic momentum, quarterly changes in Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) data provide valuable signals about GDP growth. My analysis of over 10 years of data reveals which PMI indicators are the most reliable for economic forecasting.

Manufacturing PMI: Moderate but Significant

Both ISM and S&P Global manufacturing PMI show statistically significant correlations with manufacturing GDP growth, with S&P Global slightly outperforming.

Manufacturing PMI Growth Correlations

ISM Manufacturing PMI: r = 0.451 (p = 0.0027)
S&P Global Manufacturing PMI: r = 0.520 (p = 0.0004)
Figure 1: Manufacturing PMI Growth Correlations. Scatter plots show moderate positive relationships between quarterly PMI changes and manufacturing GDP growth.

Services PMI: The Superior Indicator

The services sector analysis reveals much stronger correlations. Given that services represent approximately 70% of US GDP, these findings have significant implications for economic forecasting.

Services PMI Growth Correlations

ISM Services PMI: r = 0.693 (p < 0.0001)
S&P Global Services PMI: r = 0.770 (p < 0.0001)
Figure 2: Services PMI Growth Correlations. The S&P Global Services PMI achieves a strong correlation of 0.770, explaining approximately 59% of quarterly GDP growth variance.

Key Takeaway

S&P Global Services PMI stands out as the strongest predictor, achieving what statisticians classify as a strong correlation (r > 0.7). Changes in this indicator can explain approximately 59% of the variance in quarterly services GDP growth.

Practical Implications

These findings suggest three practical strategies for economic analysis:

  • Prioritize services PMI: The strong correlation between services PMI changes and GDP growth makes this a primary indicator for tracking real-time economic conditions. Focus especially on S&P Global Services PMI.
  • Track quarter-over-quarter changes: A move from PMI 51 to 52 signals strengthening momentum more meaningfully than the absolute level. Focus on the direction and magnitude of change.
  • Watch for divergences: When manufacturing and services PMI trends diverge significantly, it often signals sectoral shifts that may not be immediately apparent in aggregate data.

Bottom Line

Quarterly changes in PMI data provide statistically significant information about economic growth, with services sector indicators substantially outperforming manufacturing. The S&P Global Services PMI, with its 0.770 correlation, should be a cornerstone of any real-time economic monitoring toolkit.

Methodology

Data: Manufacturing GDP (FRED: VAPGDPMFG), Services GDP (FRED: SRVPRD), ISM and S&P Global PMI series

Approach: Monthly PMI converted to quarterly averages; Pearson correlations calculated between PMI changes and GDP growth rates (Q1 2015 - Q3 2025)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unemployment by state in the USA

Below is a visualization of unemployment rates by county using a powerful Python library called Bokeh . The two maps are for the states of Texas and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. As the second largest economy in the United States (10th largest in the world), Texas shows interesting county variation in macroeconomic factors such as unemployment. According to Wikipedia , in 2015, Texas was home to six of the top 50 companies on the Fortune 500 list and 51 overall (third most after New York and California). The northern counties were least affected by the financial crisis of 2008/09. Dallas–Fort Worth–Arlington area encompasses 13 counties which constitute the economic and cultural hub of the region commonly called North Texas or North Central Texas. Bokeh Plot The least affected counties in Massachusetts were the southernmost tourist areas of Nantuckett and Dukes County. The ...

Modeling Core PCE inflation: A dual approach

Today's release of the August 2025 Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation data drew widespread media attention, with coverage highlighting both the persistence of inflation and its implications for Federal Reserve policy. Across outlets, analysts pointed to resilient consumer spending and income growth as signs of underlying economic strength, even as inflation remains above the Fed's 2% target. The consensus among media reports is that while inflation is not worsening, its stubbornness continues to challenge policymakers navigating a softening labor market and evolving rate expectations. To provide deeper insights into inflation's trajectory, I've developed a forecasting framework that combines two econometric approaches — ARIMA time series modeling and Phillips Curve analysis—to predict Core PCE inflation. This analysis presents a unique opportunity to validate my forecasting methodology against eight months of 2025 data. ...

Do Minimum Wage Increases Really Kill Jobs? Evidence from the "Fight for $15" Era

The debate over minimum wage policy has raged for decades, with economists, policymakers, and business leaders offering sharply different predictions about its effects on employment. Critics warn that raising the minimum wage will force employers to cut jobs, while supporters argue that higher wages boost worker productivity and spending power. But what does the actual data tell us. Using a comprehensive difference-in-differences analysis and Federal Reserve Economic Data covering 43 U.S. states from 2012-2020 of the "Fight for $15" movement between 2012 and 2020, I provide some evidence about how minimum wage increases actually affect employment in the real world. The Perfect Natural Experiment The period from 2012 to 2020 provided economists with an ideal "natural experiment" to study minimum wage effects. Here's why this timeframe was perfect for analysis: Federal Stability : The federal minimum wage remained frozen at $7.25 per hour since 2009, creating ...