Skip to main content

Mapping the Matrix: Malaysia's Corporate Network

The complex interconnections that define modern society are readily visible in our Facebook or LinkedIn networks. But what about the corporate world?

I recently began mapping the web of cross-shareholding among Malaysia's listed corporations. Using Social Network Analysis (SNA), I visualized the ecosystem to identify key "communities" and power brokers. The goal? To see if a company's position in this web predicts its financial destiny.

The State of Play (2015)

Figure 1: Malaysia's Corporate Network in 2015 (Created via Gephi)
The map above visualizes the network as of 2015. While I have excluded specific company names, the "super-nodes" (the largest circles) represent the most connected shareholders in the economy—primarily government-linked investment companies (GLICs), fund managers, and international asset managers.

A Decade of Growing Complexity

As the Malaysian economy has grown, so has the complexity of its corporate ecosystem. Compare the dense web of 2015 (above) with the visualization below, based on data from 2005.
Figure 2: The sparsely connected network of 2005

Resilience vs. Returns

The evolution from "islands" of ownership to a massive "continent" of connectivity raises two critical questions:
  1. Contagion Risk: Does this hyper-connectivity make Corporate Malaysia more vulnerable to shocks? If one central node fails, does the whole network shake?
  2. Performance: Does location matter? My preliminary analysis suggests that densely connected firms tend to have superior financial performance (higher profitability and ROE) compared to those on the periphery.
This suggests a trade-off: connectedness may boost profits during good times, but it could amplify risks during a crisis.
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousMay 4, 2016 at 5:16 AM

    So much has changed in a decade. Good or bad?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lelo NxumaloMay 4, 2016 at 4:09 PM

      That is the purpose of the study. Its too early to say but the working hypothesis is that it depends. If greater connectedness has increased the risk of crisis contagion, then a dense network might not be ideal. If, however, it's led to more profitable and well-resourced companies, then it might be a good strategy for funds and other investors to allocate resources towards the most connected firms.
      I will be posting follow-up material as the analysis progresses.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Constructive feedback is always welcome. Thank you

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Core PCE inflation: A dual approach

Today's release of the August 2025 Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation data drew widespread media attention, with coverage highlighting both the persistence of inflation and its implications for Federal Reserve policy. Across outlets, analysts pointed to resilient consumer spending and income growth as signs of underlying economic strength, even as inflation remains above the Fed's 2% target. The consensus among media reports is that while inflation is not worsening, its stubbornness continues to challenge policymakers navigating a softening labor market and evolving rate expectations. To provide deeper insights into inflation's trajectory, I've developed a forecasting framework that combines two econometric approaches — ARIMA time series modeling and Phillips Curve analysis—to predict Core PCE inflation. This analysis presents a unique opportunity to validate my forecasting methodology against eight months of 2025 data. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Minimum Wage Increases Really Kill Jobs? Evidence from the "Fight for $15" Era

The debate over minimum wage policy has raged for decades, with economists, policymakers, and business leaders offering sharply different predictions about its effects on employment. Critics warn that raising the minimum wage will force employers to cut jobs, while supporters argue that higher wages boost worker productivity and spending power. But what does the actual data tell us. Using a comprehensive difference-in-differences analysis and Federal Reserve Economic Data covering 43 U.S. states from 2012-2020 of the "Fight for $15" movement between 2012 and 2020, I provide some evidence about how minimum wage increases actually affect employment in the real world. The Perfect Natural Experiment The period from 2012 to 2020 provided economists with an ideal "natural experiment" to study minimum wage effects. Here's why this timeframe was perfect for analysis: Federal Stability : The federal minimum wage remained frozen at $7.25 per hour since 2009, creating ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Malaysia at a Cross Roads: Diagnosing the Constraints to High Income Status

Malaysia at a Crossroads: Diagnosing Constraints to High-Income Status In 2008, Malaysia was recognized by the Growth Commission – a distinguished panel comprising 2 Nobel Prize Winning Economists and other leading development practitioners – as one of thirteen countries that sustained high growth in the post-war period. The 30-year stretch that caught the attention of the Growth Commission was between 1967 and 1997 when Malaysia grew at an average of 7.3% per year. This long stretch of growth was interrupted by periods of external shocks including the Volcker shock of 1986, the Asian Financial crisis in 1997/8, later the so-called Dot Com Bubble of 2001, and more recently the Global Financial Crisis of 2008. Despite these shocks, Malaysia remained resilient - formally earning the title "Upper Middle Income Country" in 1992. (See summary figure that breaks down the country's per capita growth story). As...
2 comments
Read more