Skip to main content

Why Nations Fail

One of the many things I learned from graduate school was the importance of having a theoretical framework within which to situate a perceived problem you seek to address. Not every problem is amenable to such conceptual grounding so it is worth articulating one for yourself so that you don't get led astray in your pursuit of feasible policies. Many of the issues I discuss in my blog can be viewed from policy frameworks used in public policy schools. Other frameworks I have had to acquire from personal research. To that end, one book that I think will stand the test of time is Why Nations Fail by Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson (2012). The key message in this tome (it is 546 pages long) is that nations fail because their extractive economic institutions do not create the incentives needed for people to save, invest, and innovate. Extractive political institutions support these economic institutions by cementing the power of those who benefit from the extraction. Extractive economic and political institutions, though their details vary under different circumstances, are always at the root of failure (372).
Inclusive Political Institutions
Exclusive Political Institutions
Inclusive Economic Institutions

Virtuous
Cycle

Unstable
Equilibrium
Exclusive Economic Institutions

Unstable
Equilibrium

Vicious
Cycle

Acemoglu and Robinson (2012) convincingly argue that countries today have gone through watershed moments in their histories–critical junctures to use their terminology– and the way the prevailing coalitions and actors responded to those critical junctures explains much of the country's institutional evolution. For example, the end of colonialism can be considered a critical juncture for many former colonies which find themselves mired in nuances of texts written to negotiate their freedom. The end of colonial subjugation in many cases marked the transition toward inclusivity as the governing parties under colonialism often served as extractive elements linking the colony to some crown in Europe.

Combining this institutional framework with other economic theories such as middle income trap can help one make sense of the goings on in so called emerging markets. If the recent civil unrests in Hong Kong, Myanmar, Brazil, Indonesia, Turkey, to name a few are any indication it is that as societies become richer, the masses will demand greater voice and accountability, i.e., inclusive political institutions. Steps towards political inclusivity could comprise clarifying and ensuring property rights, particularly with regard to land user rights; participatory democracy; broader alliance between government, citizens and business in policy dialogue; creating an accountable administration; free media; effective monitoring of elected bodies; independence of the judiciary as well as regulatory agencies among others. 

 Either way, this institutional framework allows me to situate perceived problems in a country and approximate likely context-fitting policies to facilitate greater inclusion. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Constructive feedback is always welcome. Thank you

Popular posts from this blog

Malaysia at a Cross Roads: Diagnosing the Constraints to High Income Status

Malaysia at a Crossroads: Diagnosing Constraints to High-Income Status In 2008, Malaysia was recognized by the Growth Commission – a distinguished panel comprising 2 Nobel Prize Winning Economists and other leading development practitioners – as one of thirteen countries that sustained high growth in the post-war period. The 30-year stretch that caught the attention of the Growth Commission was between 1967 and 1997 when Malaysia grew at an average of 7.3% per year. This long stretch of growth was interrupted by periods of external shocks including the Volcker shock of 1986, the Asian Financial crisis in 1997/8, later the so-called Dot Com Bubble of 2001, and more recently the Global Financial Crisis of 2008. Despite these shocks, Malaysia remained resilient - formally earning the title "Upper Middle Income Country" in 1992. (See summary figure that breaks down the country's per capita growth story). As...
2 comments
Read more

Corporate Network Analysis

The complex interconnections that define modern society are most readily visible from our Facebook, Twitter, or Linkedin networks. What is perhaps less talked about is the extent to which corporations are linked. I just started building a network of cross shareholding among Malaysia's corporations using listed company data. The map below is a preliminary visualization of the country's corporate network as of 2015. I use social network analysis (SNA) tools to partition or color the network into key connected components or communities therein. I have deliberately excluded company names but I will tell you that the biggest nodes represent the most connected shareholders including governments, fund managers, and international asset managers.  Malaysia's Corporate Network in 2015 Created Using Gephi 0.9.1 As the Malaysia economy has grown so has the complexity of the corporate network from few shareholders to many interlinked players. Below is a visualization using sha...
2 comments
Read more

Assessing labor market transitions in Ghana using panel data

Understanding labor market transitions is important for policymakers and researchers in developing countries. Changes in economic activity status (employed, unemployed, out of labor force) vary significantly from one country to another and also within countries from one socio-economic group to another. Below I summarize analysis from the latest Ghana Annual Household Income and Expenditure Survey ( AHIES ) published by the Ghana Statistical Service. The AHIES is a panel survey that has followed over 10,000 individuals since 2022Q1 to assess changes in their livelihoods. I am currently analyzing trends and show here what has happened to economic activity between Q2 and Q3.  Transitions in Ghana labor force status, 2022Q2 - 2022Q3 Source : Own analysis using AHIES from Ghana Statistical Service. Note : Left hand side is 2022Q2 and right side is 2022Q3 81 percent of working age individuals (15-64-years) who were  employed  in 2022Q2 were still employed in 2022Q3; 7 perc...
Post a Comment
Read more