Skip to main content

Why Nations Fail

One of the many things I learned from graduate school was the importance of having a theoretical framework within which to situate a perceived problem you seek to address. Not every problem is amenable to such conceptual grounding so it is worth articulating one for yourself so that you don't get led astray in your pursuit of feasible policies. Many of the issues I discuss in my blog can be viewed from policy frameworks used in public policy schools. Other frameworks I have had to acquire from personal research. To that end, one book that I think will stand the test of time is Why Nations Fail by Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson (2012). The key message in this tome (it is 546 pages long) is that nations fail because their extractive economic institutions do not create the incentives needed for people to save, invest, and innovate. Extractive political institutions support these economic institutions by cementing the power of those who benefit from the extraction. Extractive economic and political institutions, though their details vary under different circumstances, are always at the root of failure (372).
Inclusive Political Institutions
Exclusive Political Institutions
Inclusive Economic Institutions

Virtuous
Cycle

Unstable
Equilibrium
Exclusive Economic Institutions

Unstable
Equilibrium

Vicious
Cycle

Acemoglu and Robinson (2012) convincingly argue that countries today have gone through watershed moments in their histories–critical junctures to use their terminology– and the way the prevailing coalitions and actors responded to those critical junctures explains much of the country's institutional evolution. For example, the end of colonialism can be considered a critical juncture for many former colonies which find themselves mired in nuances of texts written to negotiate their freedom. The end of colonial subjugation in many cases marked the transition toward inclusivity as the governing parties under colonialism often served as extractive elements linking the colony to some crown in Europe.

Combining this institutional framework with other economic theories such as middle income trap can help one make sense of the goings on in so called emerging markets. If the recent civil unrests in Hong Kong, Myanmar, Brazil, Indonesia, Turkey, to name a few are any indication it is that as societies become richer, the masses will demand greater voice and accountability, i.e., inclusive political institutions. Steps towards political inclusivity could comprise clarifying and ensuring property rights, particularly with regard to land user rights; participatory democracy; broader alliance between government, citizens and business in policy dialogue; creating an accountable administration; free media; effective monitoring of elected bodies; independence of the judiciary as well as regulatory agencies among others. 

 Either way, this institutional framework allows me to situate perceived problems in a country and approximate likely context-fitting policies to facilitate greater inclusion. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Constructive feedback is always welcome. Thank you

Popular posts from this blog

Unemployment by state in the USA

Below is a visualization of unemployment rates by county using a powerful Python library called Bokeh . The two maps are for the states of Texas and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. As the second largest economy in the United States (10th largest in the world), Texas shows interesting county variation in macroeconomic factors such as unemployment. According to Wikipedia , in 2015, Texas was home to six of the top 50 companies on the Fortune 500 list and 51 overall (third most after New York and California). The northern counties were least affected by the financial crisis of 2008/09. Dallas–Fort Worth–Arlington area encompasses 13 counties which constitute the economic and cultural hub of the region commonly called North Texas or North Central Texas. Bokeh Plot The least affected counties in Massachusetts were the southernmost tourist areas of Nantuckett and Dukes County. The ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Modeling Core PCE inflation: A dual approach

Today's release of the August 2025 Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation data drew widespread media attention, with coverage highlighting both the persistence of inflation and its implications for Federal Reserve policy. Across outlets, analysts pointed to resilient consumer spending and income growth as signs of underlying economic strength, even as inflation remains above the Fed's 2% target. The consensus among media reports is that while inflation is not worsening, its stubbornness continues to challenge policymakers navigating a softening labor market and evolving rate expectations. To provide deeper insights into inflation's trajectory, I've developed a forecasting framework that combines two econometric approaches — ARIMA time series modeling and Phillips Curve analysis—to predict Core PCE inflation. This analysis presents a unique opportunity to validate my forecasting methodology against eight months of 2025 data. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Minimum Wage Increases Really Kill Jobs? Evidence from the "Fight for $15" Era

The debate over minimum wage policy has raged for decades, with economists, policymakers, and business leaders offering sharply different predictions about its effects on employment. Critics warn that raising the minimum wage will force employers to cut jobs, while supporters argue that higher wages boost worker productivity and spending power. But what does the actual data tell us. Using a comprehensive difference-in-differences analysis and Federal Reserve Economic Data covering 43 U.S. states from 2012-2020 of the "Fight for $15" movement between 2012 and 2020, I provide some evidence about how minimum wage increases actually affect employment in the real world. The Perfect Natural Experiment The period from 2012 to 2020 provided economists with an ideal "natural experiment" to study minimum wage effects. Here's why this timeframe was perfect for analysis: Federal Stability : The federal minimum wage remained frozen at $7.25 per hour since 2009, creating ...
Post a Comment
Read more