Skip to main content

I just read through the Agreement and it sounds promising. Having studied the history of policy making in Zimbabwe, I am however curious as to how much gap there is going to be between the actual agreement and what is implemented. The agreement does address issues such as depoliticizing the National Youth Service, which has for long been abused to further ZANU PF’s agenda, mainly in the rural areas. The agreement also states that the Prime Minister, Morgan Tsvangirai will be part of the national Security Council, of which Mugabe is the chair. It should be remembered that this is the very machinery that masterminded the intimidation of the Movement for Democratic Change in the run up to the election. I look forward to seeing how this is going to play out.

My other bone of contention is the number of bodies in the executive branch; President Mugabe and two Vice Presidents, Prime Minister Tsvangirai and 2 Deputy Prime Ministers, making a grand total of 6 officers in the executive branch (excluding their staffers). While Mugabe maintains presidential power, his authority has somewhat been diminished. With an almost balanced representation in the house of assembly and ZANU – controlled senate, I foresee gridlock in the policy making process. Personally, I am not a fan of big government, especially considering that it is our tax dollars that pay for all these bodies.

In conclusion I would like to remind you that this is not the first unity government Zimbabweans have seen. In 1987, Mugabe’s ZANU-PF signed the Unity Accord with PF ZAPU, after the Ndebele massacres in the Gukurahundi. Many saw the deal as promising, but as we saw in the recent months, the government was behaving in a manner reminiscent of pre-1987. With that being said, I am somewhat hopeful of this particular one because, Zimbabwe really needs to move on, there has been too much hurt and poverty. Let us hope the gap between policy making and policy implementation is not too wide. To that end, I concur with Denford that there needs to be active involvement of civil society through research organizations, human rights groups, think tanks, and other entities to uphold individual rights and the rule of law, and ensure that these don’t get thrown on the wayside as has been the case lately.

Comments

Post a Comment

Constructive feedback is always welcome. Thank you

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Core PCE inflation: A dual approach

Today's release of the August 2025 Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation data drew widespread media attention, with coverage highlighting both the persistence of inflation and its implications for Federal Reserve policy. Across outlets, analysts pointed to resilient consumer spending and income growth as signs of underlying economic strength, even as inflation remains above the Fed's 2% target. The consensus among media reports is that while inflation is not worsening, its stubbornness continues to challenge policymakers navigating a softening labor market and evolving rate expectations. To provide deeper insights into inflation's trajectory, I've developed a forecasting framework that combines two econometric approaches — ARIMA time series modeling and Phillips Curve analysis—to predict Core PCE inflation. This analysis presents a unique opportunity to validate my forecasting methodology against eight months of 2025 data. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Minimum Wage Increases Really Kill Jobs? Evidence from the "Fight for $15" Era

The debate over minimum wage policy has raged for decades, with economists, policymakers, and business leaders offering sharply different predictions about its effects on employment. Critics warn that raising the minimum wage will force employers to cut jobs, while supporters argue that higher wages boost worker productivity and spending power. But what does the actual data tell us. Using a comprehensive difference-in-differences analysis and Federal Reserve Economic Data covering 43 U.S. states from 2012-2020 of the "Fight for $15" movement between 2012 and 2020, I provide some evidence about how minimum wage increases actually affect employment in the real world. The Perfect Natural Experiment The period from 2012 to 2020 provided economists with an ideal "natural experiment" to study minimum wage effects. Here's why this timeframe was perfect for analysis: Federal Stability : The federal minimum wage remained frozen at $7.25 per hour since 2009, creating ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Import Price Passthrough in the US

The link between global trade and domestic inflation When import prices surge—whether from tariffs, supply chain disruptions, or currency fluctuations—how much of that increase actually shows up in the prices consumers pay at the store? This question has become increasingly important in our globalized economy, especially as policymakers debate trade policy and try to forecast inflation. The 20-30% Rule A robust finding in economics research is that import price passthrough to consumer prices in the United States is around 20-30%. This means that if import prices increase by 10%, consumer prices typically rise by 2-3%. Key studies establishing this benchmark include: Campa & Goldberg (2005): Found 25% passthrough for the US over 1975-2003 McCarthy (2007): Estimated 20-30% passthrough using structural VAR model...
Post a Comment
Read more